Newsletters

53

Caution Regarding Appeal Deadlines in Bankruptcy and Insolvency Matters!

In its recent decision in Syndic de Bopack inc. (2025 QCCA 909), the Quebec Court of Appeal reaffirmed the principle that, in matters governed by the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act, the deadline for filing a notice of appeal is ten days from the date of the judgment.

This principle is particularly important to bear in mind, as in civil matters, the time limit for filing an appeal is calculated from the date of the notice of judgment, provided the judgment was not delivered orally at the hearing.

Moreover, particular attention must be paid to appeals in bankruptcy or insolvency proceedings, as the time limit for filing an appeal is ten days, in contrast to the standard thirty-day period applicable in civil matters1.

In Syndic de Bopack inc. the appellants, having failed to file a notice of appeal within the ten-day delay, petitioned the Court of Appeal to be relieved of their default in appealing the judgment rendered by the Superior Court within the prescribed delay.

The Court of Appeal considered the following criteria:

  1. whether the appellants intended to appeal the decision prior to the expiration of the ten-day statutory delay;
  2. whether they communicated this intention to the respondent within this delay, either implicitly or explicitly, and, if so, the reasons for their failure to do so;
  3. whether the respondent would suffer prejudice as a result of an extension of the time limit; and
  4. whether the appeal had a reasonable chance of success.

The Court of Appeal found that, although the appellants’ failure to file their notice of appeal within the prescribed delay was due to an error on the part of their lawyers, the appellants had not manifested their intention to appeal the Superior Court’s judgment within the ten-day delay.

Furthermore, the Court of Appeal concluded that the appeal did not present a reasonable chance of success and accordingly dismissed the appellants’ motion to be relieved of their failure to appeal within the applicable delay.

Me Annie Claude Beauchemin and Me Juliana Boutot represented the respondent in this case, both in front of the Superior Cour and the Court of Appeal.

1Except in the cases provided for in article 361 of the Code of Civil Procedure

53

Authors

Articles in the same category

Bill 89 and the Future of Labour Disputes in Quebec

Passed by the National Assembly on May 29, 2025, Bill 89 (An Act to give greater consideration to the needs of the population in the event of a strike or a lock-out, hereinafter the “Bill”) will come into force on November 30, 2025. The Bill, which has faced strong opposition from unions, will bring significant […]

Latent Defects: Notice Must Be Given, but to Whom, When and How? The Court of Appeal Answers

On this past September 26, in the context of a claim for latent defects, in the matter of Meyer v. Pichette (Estate of Morin), 2025 QCCA 1193, the Court of appeal confirmed a Superior Court judgment which dismissed proceedings in warranty brought against former vendors as sufficient notice of the defects was not provided prior […]

You Should Not Believe Everything you Read on Social Media…

In a recent decision, Boucal v. Rancourt-Maltais, the Superior Court reviewed the principles applicable to defamation cases. Facts The Defendant is a member of a private Facebook group called “Féministes Bas-St-Laurent”. In this group, Ms. Khadidiatou Yewwi allegedly posted testimony about the Plaintiff. Stating that she was troubled by the testimony and had herself heard […]

The Window of Conflict and Police Officers

In the case of Souccar v. Pathmasiri, rendered on June 11, the Quebec Superior Court was called upon to decide on a civil liability claim regarding an allegedly abusive arrest and detention. The dispute arose from a condominium disagreement concerning the installation of windows. Police Intervention In July 2016, window installers hired by the condominium […]

Same Approach, Same Result… Yet Again!

Last June, we published a newsletter following the decision rendered in Michel Grenier v. Me Julie Charbonneau, Roger Picard and Conseil de discipline de l’Ordre des psychologues du Québec. This decision followed the filing by the Defendants of Motions to Dismiss, which were granted by the judge of the Superior court. At the time the […]

Is Planned Obsolescence Finally Coming to an End on October 5, 2025?

While a dishwasher from the 1980s can still run smoothly, many newer models seem to break down after just a few cycles! The 2023 adoption of the Act to Protect Consumers Against Planned Obsolescence and to Promote the Durability, Repairability and Maintenance of Goods1 (hereinafter the “Anti-Obsolescence Act“), which modified the Consumer Protection Act2 (the “C.P.A.“), aimed […]