Newsletters

151

Caution Regarding Appeal Deadlines in Bankruptcy and Insolvency Matters!

In its recent decision in Syndic de Bopack inc. (2025 QCCA 909), the Quebec Court of Appeal reaffirmed the principle that, in matters governed by the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act, the deadline for filing a notice of appeal is ten days from the date of the judgment.

This principle is particularly important to bear in mind, as in civil matters, the time limit for filing an appeal is calculated from the date of the notice of judgment, provided the judgment was not delivered orally at the hearing.

Moreover, particular attention must be paid to appeals in bankruptcy or insolvency proceedings, as the time limit for filing an appeal is ten days, in contrast to the standard thirty-day period applicable in civil matters1.

In Syndic de Bopack inc. the appellants, having failed to file a notice of appeal within the ten-day delay, petitioned the Court of Appeal to be relieved of their default in appealing the judgment rendered by the Superior Court within the prescribed delay.

The Court of Appeal considered the following criteria:

  1. whether the appellants intended to appeal the decision prior to the expiration of the ten-day statutory delay;
  2. whether they communicated this intention to the respondent within this delay, either implicitly or explicitly, and, if so, the reasons for their failure to do so;
  3. whether the respondent would suffer prejudice as a result of an extension of the time limit; and
  4. whether the appeal had a reasonable chance of success.

The Court of Appeal found that, although the appellants’ failure to file their notice of appeal within the prescribed delay was due to an error on the part of their lawyers, the appellants had not manifested their intention to appeal the Superior Court’s judgment within the ten-day delay.

Furthermore, the Court of Appeal concluded that the appeal did not present a reasonable chance of success and accordingly dismissed the appellants’ motion to be relieved of their failure to appeal within the applicable delay.

Me Annie Claude Beauchemin and Me Juliana Boutot represented the respondent in this case, both in front of the Superior Cour and the Court of Appeal.

1Except in the cases provided for in article 361 of the Code of Civil Procedure

151

Authors

Articles in the same category

No Notice of Default, No Termination

In Pavage Wemindji Inc. v. Compagnie de Construction et de Développement crie ltée, the Quebec Superior Court emphasized that a valid notice of default (mise en demeure) is not just a formality—it’s a precondition to exercising remedies like contract termination in many cases under Quebec civil law. The Decision The plaintiff, Pavage Wemindji Inc. (“Wemindji”), […]

Public Contracts: When Does a Penalty Clause Cross the Line?

Penalty clauses are a practical tool for owners: instead of having to prove actual losses when a contractor falls short, they can rely on a pre-agreed sum. For contractors, however, the stakes are equally significant — a lump-sum penalty can consume a substantial portion of the contract’s value. Still, the mechanism has its limits. Courts […]

Not So Intelligent!

Since the widespread adoption of artificial intelligence tools, growing concerns have emerged regarding their use in judicial proceedings. Recent decisions have relied on section 342 of the Code of Civil Procedure to sanction parties who make improper use of such tools. More specifically, this provision has been invoked on several occasions to address the use or citation […]

So? Is it settled or not?

In an interim decision in Djaferian v. Spanoudakis,rendered on February 20, 2026, the Superior Court had to determine whether an offer made 15 months earlier, prior to the institution of proceedings, could still be accepted and result in a transaction. Summary of Facts and Timeline The Plaintiff, a co-owner who sustained water damage to his private […]

Office Parties and the Employer’s Duty to Prevent Harassment

In De Sousa and Corporation interactive Eidos, 2026 QCTAT 4, the Quebec Administrative Labour Tribunal (ALT) appears to have broadened the scope of an employer’s obligation to prevent harassment. The decision arose from a complaint filed by a former employee who had been sexually assaulted at her home by a colleague following an office party organized by the […]

Should Economic Losses Be Considered Property Damage?

The Quebec Court of Appeal in Zurich, Compagnie d’assurances SA c. CRT Construction inc., recently overturned the Superior Court’s decision on the interpretation of a construction insurance policy. Facts CRT Construction Inc. (“CRT”) was retained by the City of Montreal (“City”) to perform major construction work at the Atwater water treatment plant. At the City’s request, CRT […]