Newsletters

132

COVID-19 and Force Majeure: Navigating Exceptional Times as a Business

Everything has changed since the World Health Organization declared COVID-19 a pandemic on March 11, 2020, and it has since become increasingly clear that its impact will be felt across every level of society and industry. Businesses and individuals, reeling from the economic impacts of COVID-19, are wondering how it will impact their various contracts, legal obligations and commitments. In particular many are wondering if force majeure, an often under-considered element of most contracts, is relevant at this exceptional time.

What is Force Majeure?

Under the Civil Code of Québec, force majeure (or in English, “superior force”) is an event that may allow an actor to free themselves from liability for harm they cause, or from a debt they owe, to another.

In order for the actor to demonstrate that the event was in fact force majeure, they must establish three things:

  • First, that the event was unforeseeable, and therefore could not have been predicted or anticipated;
  • Second, that it was irresistible, meaning there was nothing they could have done to mitigate, avoid, or control it; and
  • Third, that the unforeseeable and irresistible event made those obligations impossible to fulfill.

It should also be noted that certain contracts can waive the application of force majeure altogether, or modify it such that parties don’t have to meet the above criteria for it to apply.

Is COVID-19 Force Majeure?

Whether COVID-19 and its impacts on businesses will fall under the Civil Code of Québec’s definition of force majeure has yet to be established by the Quebec courts. If a court finds that COVID-19 is in fact force majeure then this will undeniably have a major impact on many business and other obligations in the province.

A global pandemic may very well be an unforeseeable and irresistible event but this does not mean that it will render every obligation affected by it impossible to meet. For example a commercial tenant that is no longer able to run its business because of the Quebec Government’s mandatory shutdown of non-essential businesses might still technically be able to pay its rent.

It should be noted that there is case law in Quebec indicating that government regulation following an unforeseeable and irresistible event, and not simply the event itself, can be considered force majeure.

Force Majeure Clauses

For many businesses, the most important step when considering force majeure will be to check their various contracts to see if there is a force majeure clause, and if so, what it says.

Force majeure is not of public order in Quebec and contracting parties are therefore free to modify the circumstances and obligations related to such an event. Many contracts list the specific kinds of events that will constitute force majeure and these may or may not include something like a pandemic. Other contracts will waive the application of force majeure for elimination of liability altogether.

Many contracts will include other clauses that must be taken into consideration in situations of possible force majeure. These include the common requirement for businesses to maintain business interruption insurance to protect themselves from the economic fallout of an unforeseeable and irresistible event.

What Should You Do?

The first step for anyone thinking about force majeure and its impact on them or their business should be to check their contracts to see what is included in terms of force majeure and business interruption insurance clauses.

If their contracts do include such clauses, these will certainly be the starting point for any future interpretation and resulting obligations.

For contracts that do not include these clauses, the analysis will be largely review the facts on a case-by-case basis, exploring the true impossibility of performance of the obligation, and possible liability.

Legal Ramifications

Lawyers will likely give greater thought to the careful drafting of force majeure and related contractual clauses going forward. Previously included in contracts as a “miscellaneous” or “boilerplate” provision (if at all), this pandemic has shown us that the application and impact of force majeure is anything but standard-form.

As always, we at RSS are here to help you with the drafting and understanding of your contracts. Should you want to know more about any of the above, or if you have any other questions please reach out to any member of our Business Law Group who will be eager to work with you.

132

Authors

Sharon G. Druker, Ad. E.

Lawyer, Partner and Head of the Corporate Services Department

Geneviève Goulet

Lawyer, Partner and Co-chair of the Business Law Group

Articles in the same category

When Love and Construction Contracts Go Out the Window…

In Gélinas v. LG Constructions TR inc., rendered on October 30, 2025, the Court of Appeal comments on the legal framework governing a contractor unilaterally terminating two construction contracts. In particular, the Court clarifies the application of article 2129 of the Civil Code of Quebec (“C.C.Q.”), which provides, when applicable, that a client is bound […]

Finally Properly Interpreted, the Policy Had a Heart

In a recent decision, Morissette v. BMO Société d’assurance vie, the Superior Court reviewed the principles applicable to the interpretation of insurance policies. Facts In June 2003, the Plaintiff took out a health insurance policy (hereinafter “Policy”) with BMO Société d’assurance vie (hereinafter “BMO”). The Policy provides, among other things, that $150,000 will be paid […]

When the Remedy Becomes the Dispute: Medical Liability Under Scrutiny

In the case N.L. v. Mathieu, 2025 QCCS 517, the Superior Court dismissed a medical liability lawsuit filed by a teacher against her former family doctor, in which she sought over $1.9 million in damages. The plaintiff accused her doctor of having inappropriately prescribed medication over several years, without proper follow-up and without informing her […]

Bill 89 and the Future of Labour Disputes in Quebec

Passed by the National Assembly on May 29, 2025, Bill 89 (An Act to give greater consideration to the needs of the population in the event of a strike or a lock-out, hereinafter the “Bill”) will come into force on November 30, 2025. The Bill, which has faced strong opposition from unions, will bring significant […]

Latent Defects: Notice Must Be Given, but to Whom, When and How? The Court of Appeal Answers

On this past September 26, in the context of a claim for latent defects, in the matter of Meyer v. Pichette (Estate of Morin), 2025 QCCA 1193, the Court of appeal confirmed a Superior Court judgment which dismissed proceedings in warranty brought against former vendors as sufficient notice of the defects was not provided prior […]

You Should Not Believe Everything you Read on Social Media…

In a recent decision, Boucal v. Rancourt-Maltais, the Superior Court reviewed the principles applicable to defamation cases. Facts The Defendant is a member of a private Facebook group called “Féministes Bas-St-Laurent”. In this group, Ms. Khadidiatou Yewwi allegedly posted testimony about the Plaintiff. Stating that she was troubled by the testimony and had herself heard […]