Newsletters

195

COVID-19 and Force Majeure: Navigating Exceptional Times as a Business

Everything has changed since the World Health Organization declared COVID-19 a pandemic on March 11, 2020, and it has since become increasingly clear that its impact will be felt across every level of society and industry. Businesses and individuals, reeling from the economic impacts of COVID-19, are wondering how it will impact their various contracts, legal obligations and commitments. In particular many are wondering if force majeure, an often under-considered element of most contracts, is relevant at this exceptional time.

What is Force Majeure?

Under the Civil Code of Québec, force majeure (or in English, “superior force”) is an event that may allow an actor to free themselves from liability for harm they cause, or from a debt they owe, to another.

In order for the actor to demonstrate that the event was in fact force majeure, they must establish three things:

  • First, that the event was unforeseeable, and therefore could not have been predicted or anticipated;
  • Second, that it was irresistible, meaning there was nothing they could have done to mitigate, avoid, or control it; and
  • Third, that the unforeseeable and irresistible event made those obligations impossible to fulfill.

It should also be noted that certain contracts can waive the application of force majeure altogether, or modify it such that parties don’t have to meet the above criteria for it to apply.

Is COVID-19 Force Majeure?

Whether COVID-19 and its impacts on businesses will fall under the Civil Code of Québec’s definition of force majeure has yet to be established by the Quebec courts. If a court finds that COVID-19 is in fact force majeure then this will undeniably have a major impact on many business and other obligations in the province.

A global pandemic may very well be an unforeseeable and irresistible event but this does not mean that it will render every obligation affected by it impossible to meet. For example a commercial tenant that is no longer able to run its business because of the Quebec Government’s mandatory shutdown of non-essential businesses might still technically be able to pay its rent.

It should be noted that there is case law in Quebec indicating that government regulation following an unforeseeable and irresistible event, and not simply the event itself, can be considered force majeure.

Force Majeure Clauses

For many businesses, the most important step when considering force majeure will be to check their various contracts to see if there is a force majeure clause, and if so, what it says.

Force majeure is not of public order in Quebec and contracting parties are therefore free to modify the circumstances and obligations related to such an event. Many contracts list the specific kinds of events that will constitute force majeure and these may or may not include something like a pandemic. Other contracts will waive the application of force majeure for elimination of liability altogether.

Many contracts will include other clauses that must be taken into consideration in situations of possible force majeure. These include the common requirement for businesses to maintain business interruption insurance to protect themselves from the economic fallout of an unforeseeable and irresistible event.

What Should You Do?

The first step for anyone thinking about force majeure and its impact on them or their business should be to check their contracts to see what is included in terms of force majeure and business interruption insurance clauses.

If their contracts do include such clauses, these will certainly be the starting point for any future interpretation and resulting obligations.

For contracts that do not include these clauses, the analysis will be largely review the facts on a case-by-case basis, exploring the true impossibility of performance of the obligation, and possible liability.

Legal Ramifications

Lawyers will likely give greater thought to the careful drafting of force majeure and related contractual clauses going forward. Previously included in contracts as a “miscellaneous” or “boilerplate” provision (if at all), this pandemic has shown us that the application and impact of force majeure is anything but standard-form.

As always, we at RSS are here to help you with the drafting and understanding of your contracts. Should you want to know more about any of the above, or if you have any other questions please reach out to any member of our Business Law Group who will be eager to work with you.

195

Authors

Sharon G. Druker, Ad. E.

Lawyer, Partner and Head of the Corporate Services Department

Geneviève Goulet

Lawyer, Partner and Co-chair of the Business Law Group

Articles in the same category

An Insurer Is Not Required to Uncover What the Insured Was Required to Disclose

In Kayembe-Kabeya v. Industrielle Alliance, assurance et services financiers inc., 2026 QCCS 1714, the Superior Court sets the record straight on the principle of contractual “utmost good faith”. The Facts In September 2019, Ms. Ricady Mede (hereinafter “Mede”) purchased a life insurance policy from Industrielle Alliance (hereinafter the “Insurer”). A few months later, she died of […]

When it’s too late for latent defects…

The Superior Court recently rendered a judgment in Reinert v. Construction Maurice Bilodeau Inc., 2026 QCCS 2276, dealing with timeliness to give notice in cases of latent defects. The Facts In 2013, Ms. Sylvie Reinert and Mr. Denis Leclerc retained Construction Maurice Bilodeau Inc. (“CMB”) for the construction of a residential building on a vacant lot in Lévis. […]

Insurance Math: One Claim, Two Fires, Three Points of Origin, Zero Recovery: When Circumstantial Evidence Speaks Louder Than a Confession

In Chatel v. Desjardins Insurance, 2026 QCCS 712, the Quebec Superior Court reaffirmed a principle of insurance law: direct evidence is not required to establish an intentional fault. Mr. Chatel claimed $532,000 under his homeowner’s insurance policy following two fires that occurred four days apart. The first caused partial damage to his residence, while the second […]

The Quarrelsome Litigant: When the Right to Sue Becomes a Scourge

Access to the courts is a fundamental right, but what happens when a person uses it not to assert legitimate rights, but to harass others or clog the system to excess? This is quarrelsomeness: the tendency to exercise one’s right to litigate in an excessive or unreasonable manner. Far from being a marginal phenomenon, it […]

Before Buying a Product, Read This: The Rules Are Changing on October 5!

On October 5, 2026, the final amendments to the Regulation amending the Regulation respecting the application of the Consumer Protection Act (the “Regulation“) are expected to come into force, completing the implementation of the new “good working order” warranty in the province of Quebec. When this warranty applies, the merchant or manufacturer will be required to repair […]

No Notice of Default, No Termination

In Pavage Wemindji Inc. v. Compagnie de Construction et de Développement crie ltée, the Quebec Superior Court emphasized that a valid notice of default (mise en demeure) is not just a formality—it’s a precondition to exercising remedies like contract termination in many cases under Quebec civil law. The Decision The plaintiff, Pavage Wemindji Inc. (“Wemindji”), […]