Newsletters

708

Update on the Requirement to Disclose Your Prête-Nom or Nominee Agreements to Revenu Québec

As previously explained in our August 15, 2019 newsletter, Revenu Québec announced new rules on May 17, 2019 requiring the disclosure of all nominee agreements. The application of those rules was suspended until regulations could be adopted. Bill 42 implementing these rules was made final on September 24, 2020, and those rules are now in effect (An Act to give effect to fiscal measures announced in the Budget Speech delivered on 21 March 2019 and to various other measures, SQ 2020, c 16).

Whether or not they already had to be disclosed to Revenu Québec in the provincial corporate income tax return (CO-17-T), ALL Québec taxpayers must now disclose ALL nominee agreements that fall into the following two categories:

  • All nominee agreements signed on or after May 17, 2019, which must be disclosed within the earlier of (i) December 23, 2020 and (ii) 90 days from the date of signature; and
  • All nominee agreements signed before May 17, 2019 but which have income tax consequences that continue after that date (for example, as to the deduction of expenses, the attribution of rental income, the imposition of a capital gain, claiming the principal residence exemption, etc.), which must be disclosed by or before December 23, 2020.

Nominee agreements signed before May 17, 2019 which do not have any continuing tax consequences after that date do not need to be disclosed under these new rules.

The disclosure must be made by completing and filing form TP-1079.PN. The information to be disclosed includes the date of the nominee agreement, the identity of all the parties, a full description of the transaction (or the series of transactions) covered by the nominee agreement and the identity of any person or entity for which there are resulting tax consequences, as well as a copy of any written document setting out the arrangement. Disclosure by any party to the nominee agreement covers all parties to it.

Failure to disclose your nominee agreement can result in an initial penalty of $1,000 plus an additional daily penalty of $100 (up to a maximum total penalty of $5,000). As well, Revenu Québec can suspend your tax assessment period, which means that prescription does not begin to run on its tax claims against you.

For more information on these new rules, and for assistance in preparing the required disclosure materials, please contact one of our following professionals:

Martin Lord mlord@rsslex.com 514 393-4041
Sharon G. Druker sgdruker@rsslex.com 514 393-4014
Geneviève Goulet ggoulet@rsslex.com 514 393-7422

708

Authors

Sharon G. Druker, Ad. E.

Lawyer, Partner and Head of the Corporate Services Department

Geneviève Goulet

Lawyer, Partner and Co-chair of the Business Law Group

Articles in the same category

When Love and Construction Contracts Go Out the Window…

In Gélinas v. LG Constructions TR inc., rendered on October 30, 2025, the Court of Appeal comments on the legal framework governing a contractor unilaterally terminating two construction contracts. In particular, the Court clarifies the application of article 2129 of the Civil Code of Quebec (“C.C.Q.”), which provides, when applicable, that a client is bound […]

Finally Properly Interpreted, the Policy Had a Heart

In a recent decision, Morissette v. BMO Société d’assurance vie, the Superior Court reviewed the principles applicable to the interpretation of insurance policies. Facts In June 2003, the Plaintiff took out a health insurance policy (hereinafter “Policy”) with BMO Société d’assurance vie (hereinafter “BMO”). The Policy provides, among other things, that $150,000 will be paid […]

When the Remedy Becomes the Dispute: Medical Liability Under Scrutiny

In the case N.L. v. Mathieu, 2025 QCCS 517, the Superior Court dismissed a medical liability lawsuit filed by a teacher against her former family doctor, in which she sought over $1.9 million in damages. The plaintiff accused her doctor of having inappropriately prescribed medication over several years, without proper follow-up and without informing her […]

Bill 89 and the Future of Labour Disputes in Quebec

Passed by the National Assembly on May 29, 2025, Bill 89 (An Act to give greater consideration to the needs of the population in the event of a strike or a lock-out, hereinafter the “Bill”) will come into force on November 30, 2025. The Bill, which has faced strong opposition from unions, will bring significant […]

Latent Defects: Notice Must Be Given, but to Whom, When and How? The Court of Appeal Answers

On this past September 26, in the context of a claim for latent defects, in the matter of Meyer v. Pichette (Estate of Morin), 2025 QCCA 1193, the Court of appeal confirmed a Superior Court judgment which dismissed proceedings in warranty brought against former vendors as sufficient notice of the defects was not provided prior […]

You Should Not Believe Everything you Read on Social Media…

In a recent decision, Boucal v. Rancourt-Maltais, the Superior Court reviewed the principles applicable to defamation cases. Facts The Defendant is a member of a private Facebook group called “Féministes Bas-St-Laurent”. In this group, Ms. Khadidiatou Yewwi allegedly posted testimony about the Plaintiff. Stating that she was troubled by the testimony and had herself heard […]