Newsletters

July 15, 2020

185

The Judicial Clock Will Be Running Again in September

Over the last month, activities in various sectors are gradually resuming and the re-openings are occurring in phases — as has been the case for our courts.

You may recall that last March, ministerial orders were issued to order the suspension of numerous delays and limitation periods until the Government of Quebec announces the end of the current state of emergency, which continues to be extended. On May 28, we informed you that the Courts would gradually resume their activities as of June 1st. We highlighted that the delays which were suspended temporarily, including prescription periods and procedural delays, would eventually be lifted.

As was to be expected, the Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Quebec, Mr. Simon Jolin-Barrette, and the new Chief Justice of Québec, the Honourable Manon Savard, have just announced that the suspension of these delays will be lifted on August 31st, which means that as of September 1st, the clock starts ticking again. As such, whatever time remained prior to the pandemic is added. In addition, if, on March 15, a protocol to ready the file for trial was in force, a 45-day grace period will be added to facilitate the process.

Mr. Jolin-Barette stated that the objective for making this early announcement is to inform citizens and the legal community so that necessary measures are taken by all as soon as possible. It is hoped that this will attenuate some impacts of the pandemic on both the citizens and the legal system.

Now is the time to re-activate files and ensure that whatever claims you may have are reviewed to ensure that your rights are preserved.

  • If you are presently involved in litigation, make sure to contact your lawyer to get updated instructions on how to prepare.
  • You should also contact a lawyer if you are in a potentially litigious situation that has not yet triggered legal action. Time will be running, and certain rights may become unenforceable.

185

Authors

Mariella De Stefano

Lawyer, Partner and Co-chair of the Insurance Law Group

Articles in the same category

Insurance Law

May 11, 2026

No Notice of Default, No Termination

In Pavage Wemindji Inc. v. Compagnie de Construction et de Développement crie ltée, the Quebec Superior Court emphasized that a valid notice of default (mise en demeure) is not just a formality—it’s a precondition to exercising remedies like contract termination in many cases under Quebec civil law. The Decision The plaintiff, Pavage Wemindji Inc. (“Wemindji”), […]
Insurance Law

May 6, 2026

Public Contracts: When Does a Penalty Clause Cross the Line?

Penalty clauses are a practical tool for owners: instead of having to prove actual losses when a contractor falls short, they can rely on a pre-agreed sum. For contractors, however, the stakes are equally significant — a lump-sum penalty can consume a substantial portion of the contract’s value. Still, the mechanism has its limits. Courts […]
Insurance Law / Newsletters

April 24, 2026

Not So Intelligent!

Since the widespread adoption of artificial intelligence tools, growing concerns have emerged regarding their use in judicial proceedings. Recent decisions have relied on section 342 of the Code of Civil Procedure to sanction parties who make improper use of such tools. More specifically, this provision has been invoked on several occasions to address the use or citation […]
Insurance Law / Newsletters

April 2, 2026

So? Is it settled or not?

In an interim decision in Djaferian v. Spanoudakis,rendered on February 20, 2026, the Superior Court had to determine whether an offer made 15 months earlier, prior to the institution of proceedings, could still be accepted and result in a transaction. Summary of Facts and Timeline The Plaintiff, a co-owner who sustained water damage to his private […]
Labour and Employment Law / Newsletters

April 1, 2026

Office Parties and the Employer’s Duty to Prevent Harassment

In De Sousa and Corporation interactive Eidos, 2026 QCTAT 4, the Quebec Administrative Labour Tribunal (ALT) appears to have broadened the scope of an employer’s obligation to prevent harassment. The decision arose from a complaint filed by a former employee who had been sexually assaulted at her home by a colleague following an office party organized by the […]
Insurance Law / Newsletters

March 24, 2026

Should Economic Losses Be Considered Property Damage?

The Quebec Court of Appeal in Zurich, Compagnie d’assurances SA c. CRT Construction inc., recently overturned the Superior Court’s decision on the interpretation of a construction insurance policy. Facts CRT Construction Inc. (“CRT”) was retained by the City of Montreal (“City”) to perform major construction work at the Atwater water treatment plant. At the City’s request, CRT […]