Newsletters

114

Courts to Resume Activities as the COVID-19 Crisis Cools Off (Slightly…)

The threat of the coronavirus is far from over. Yet, some activities slowly resume. The Courts, which were almost paralyzed for over two months, are gradually adjusting to the new reality. What will the impact be?

The Superior Court of Quebec is preparing to progressively resume its activities as of June 1, 2020. The goal is to hear half of the trials that had been scheduled for the month of June. Priority will be given as follows:

  • Urgent matters including family matters;
  • Files which may be heard by means other than being present in the Courtroom, via virtual means, videoconferences or telephone conferences;
  • Files where the presence of witnesses is not necessary;
  • Civil matters of short duration.

The Court of Quebec which hear matters less than $85,000 has also established progressive measures for its activities commencing June 1. Cases of an urgent nature as well as those classified as being priority in nature will be dealt with first.

The Courts will have complete discretion to determine which files should be postponed. The ultimate goal is to hear as many cases as possible and to eventually resume normal activities; however, this will depend on the health situation, government restrictions and availability of the judges, courtrooms and personnel.

You will recall that the Minister of Justice in conjunction with the Chief Justice of Quebec had issued a ministerial order on March 15, 2020, for the suspension of all limitation periods until the Government of Quebec announces the end of the current state of emergency, which has been extended until June 3. As the Courts resume their activities progressively, we foresee that the delays which were suspended temporarily, including prescription periods and procedural delays will be lifted. Once the suspension is lifted, those delays are extended by the amount of days the state of emergency lasted.

Please note that the above are general comments: the conditions for the reopening of judicial activities will vary between the various courts and tribunals, and between judicial districts.

If you have any ongoing judicial activity, you should contact your lawyer for specific advice.

114

Authors

Mariella De Stefano

Lawyer, Partner and Co-chair of the Insurance Law Group

Articles in the same category

When Love and Construction Contracts Go Out the Window…

In Gélinas v. LG Constructions TR inc., rendered on October 30, 2025, the Court of Appeal comments on the legal framework governing a contractor unilaterally terminating two construction contracts. In particular, the Court clarifies the application of article 2129 of the Civil Code of Quebec (“C.C.Q.”), which provides, when applicable, that a client is bound […]

Finally Properly Interpreted, the Policy Had a Heart

In a recent decision, Morissette v. BMO Société d’assurance vie, the Superior Court reviewed the principles applicable to the interpretation of insurance policies. Facts In June 2003, the Plaintiff took out a health insurance policy (hereinafter “Policy”) with BMO Société d’assurance vie (hereinafter “BMO”). The Policy provides, among other things, that $150,000 will be paid […]

When the Remedy Becomes the Dispute: Medical Liability Under Scrutiny

In the case N.L. v. Mathieu, 2025 QCCS 517, the Superior Court dismissed a medical liability lawsuit filed by a teacher against her former family doctor, in which she sought over $1.9 million in damages. The plaintiff accused her doctor of having inappropriately prescribed medication over several years, without proper follow-up and without informing her […]

Bill 89 and the Future of Labour Disputes in Quebec

Passed by the National Assembly on May 29, 2025, Bill 89 (An Act to give greater consideration to the needs of the population in the event of a strike or a lock-out, hereinafter the “Bill”) will come into force on November 30, 2025. The Bill, which has faced strong opposition from unions, will bring significant […]

Latent Defects: Notice Must Be Given, but to Whom, When and How? The Court of Appeal Answers

On this past September 26, in the context of a claim for latent defects, in the matter of Meyer v. Pichette (Estate of Morin), 2025 QCCA 1193, the Court of appeal confirmed a Superior Court judgment which dismissed proceedings in warranty brought against former vendors as sufficient notice of the defects was not provided prior […]

You Should Not Believe Everything you Read on Social Media…

In a recent decision, Boucal v. Rancourt-Maltais, the Superior Court reviewed the principles applicable to defamation cases. Facts The Defendant is a member of a private Facebook group called “Féministes Bas-St-Laurent”. In this group, Ms. Khadidiatou Yewwi allegedly posted testimony about the Plaintiff. Stating that she was troubled by the testimony and had herself heard […]