Newsletters

143

Courts to Resume Activities as the COVID-19 Crisis Cools Off (Slightly…)

The threat of the coronavirus is far from over. Yet, some activities slowly resume. The Courts, which were almost paralyzed for over two months, are gradually adjusting to the new reality. What will the impact be?

The Superior Court of Quebec is preparing to progressively resume its activities as of June 1, 2020. The goal is to hear half of the trials that had been scheduled for the month of June. Priority will be given as follows:

  • Urgent matters including family matters;
  • Files which may be heard by means other than being present in the Courtroom, via virtual means, videoconferences or telephone conferences;
  • Files where the presence of witnesses is not necessary;
  • Civil matters of short duration.

The Court of Quebec which hear matters less than $85,000 has also established progressive measures for its activities commencing June 1. Cases of an urgent nature as well as those classified as being priority in nature will be dealt with first.

The Courts will have complete discretion to determine which files should be postponed. The ultimate goal is to hear as many cases as possible and to eventually resume normal activities; however, this will depend on the health situation, government restrictions and availability of the judges, courtrooms and personnel.

You will recall that the Minister of Justice in conjunction with the Chief Justice of Quebec had issued a ministerial order on March 15, 2020, for the suspension of all limitation periods until the Government of Quebec announces the end of the current state of emergency, which has been extended until June 3. As the Courts resume their activities progressively, we foresee that the delays which were suspended temporarily, including prescription periods and procedural delays will be lifted. Once the suspension is lifted, those delays are extended by the amount of days the state of emergency lasted.

Please note that the above are general comments: the conditions for the reopening of judicial activities will vary between the various courts and tribunals, and between judicial districts.

If you have any ongoing judicial activity, you should contact your lawyer for specific advice.

143

Authors

Mariella De Stefano

Lawyer, Partner and Co-chair of the Insurance Law Group

Articles in the same category

Ruin Finds a Reason

In Société d’assurance Beneva Inc. c. Ville de Sherbrooke, 2026 QCCA 1301, the Court of Appeal delivers a decision as concise as it is compelling on liability arising from the ruin of an immovable, in a case involving the rupture of a water main. Its impact could extend well beyond underground pipe failures. The Facts […]

There Is No Point in Submitting a Bid Without Conducting Your Research First

In 9329-0146 Québec Inc. (M. Potvin Excavation) v. City of Saint-Constant, 2026 QCCA 1199, the Quebec Court of Appeal reaffirmed the principles governing a contracting authority’s duty to provide information and a bidder’s corresponding duty to seek clarification where necessary. The Facts  In May 2020, the City of Saint-Constant issued a public call for bids […]

2026 World Cup: FIFA Can Commercialise the Tournament, But Not Trust

Introduction With 48 teams, 104 matches, three host countries and 39 days of competition, the 2026 World Cup was already destined to make history because of its sheer scale. On the field, with a transformed VAR system (Video Assistant Referee) and FIFA’s new regulations, every player action was subjected to microscopic scrutiny. Off the field, […]

An Insurer Is Not Required to Uncover What the Insured Was Required to Disclose

In Kayembe-Kabeya v. Industrielle Alliance, assurance et services financiers inc., 2026 QCCS 1714, the Superior Court sets the record straight on the principle of contractual “utmost good faith”. The Facts In September 2019, Ms. Ricady Mede (hereinafter “Mede”) purchased a life insurance policy from Industrielle Alliance (hereinafter the “Insurer”). A few months later, she died of […]

When it’s too late for latent defects…

The Superior Court recently rendered a judgment in Reinert v. Construction Maurice Bilodeau Inc., 2026 QCCS 2276, dealing with timeliness to give notice in cases of latent defects. The Facts In 2013, Ms. Sylvie Reinert and Mr. Denis Leclerc retained Construction Maurice Bilodeau Inc. (“CMB”) for the construction of a residential building on a vacant lot in Lévis. […]

Insurance Math: One Claim, Two Fires, Three Points of Origin, Zero Recovery: When Circumstantial Evidence Speaks Louder Than a Confession

In Chatel v. Desjardins Insurance, 2026 QCCS 712, the Quebec Superior Court reaffirmed a principle of insurance law: direct evidence is not required to establish an intentional fault. Mr. Chatel claimed $532,000 under his homeowner’s insurance policy following two fires that occurred four days apart. The first caused partial damage to his residence, while the second […]