Newsletters

133

Employee Mental Health on Return to Work: A Component to Consider

On April 28, 2020, the Quebec government announced a gradual recovery in economic activity. Some reopenings will take place in manufacturing, construction and retail.

As an employer, you are required by the Act respecting occupational health and safety to take the necessary steps to protect your workers’ health and safety. Therefore, not only will you have to follow the health guidelines provided by the government when you resume your activities, but you will also have to ensure that your employees comply with them.

In addition to following health guidelines, your obligation extends to protecting the mental health of your workers. Risks caused by the pandemic may include stress, anxiety, and depression. One can anticipate a difficult return in terms of motivation, and an increased need on the part of workers for autonomy and flexibility of working hours.

Stress, anxiety and depression can have physical, emotional and behavioural impacts. At stake in the return to work is how an employer should respond to employees with such symptoms. To this end, the CNESST has produced a checklist-type reminder of the precautions that an employer should take to prepare for the day where employees come back to the workplace.

For example, an employee on a construction site who has difficulty concentrating or is irritable or aggressive can pose a health and safety hazard to himself and his colleagues. It is therefore important to perform certain checks to take the necessary measures to remedy the situation, whether by ordering the worker to return home or by providing assistance.

Note that a mental health problem may, in some cases, be considered a disability within the meaning of section 10 of the Charter of Human Rights and Freedoms [Charter]. More specifically, section 16 of the Charter lists a few situations in which an employer cannot discriminate on the basis of a disability:

16. No one may practise discrimination in respect of the hiring, apprenticeship, duration of the probationary period, vocational training, promotion, transfer, displacement, laying-off, suspension, dismissal or conditions of employment of a person or in the establishment of categories or classes of employment.

Thus, when relaunching your activities, you should keep in mind the possibility of having to implement reasonable accommodations for some of your employees. Otherwise, you may be subject to complaints before the CNESST or the Commission des droits de la personne et des droits de la jeunesse.

We also recommend that you develop your plan to relaunch your business as quickly as possible. RSS’s Labour and Employment team can assist you with this, ensuring that you meet your legal obligations in terms of occupational health and safety, to prevent potential complaints.

133

Articles in the same category

Is Planned Obsolescence Finally Coming to an End on October 5, 2025?

While a dishwasher from the 1980s can still run smoothly, many newer models seem to break down after just a few cycles! The 2023 adoption of the Act to Protect Consumers Against Planned Obsolescence and to Promote the Durability, Repairability and Maintenance of Goods1 (hereinafter the “Anti-Obsolescence Act“), which modified the Consumer Protection Act2 (the “C.P.A.“), aimed […]

Caution Regarding Appeal Deadlines in Bankruptcy and Insolvency Matters!

In its recent decision in Syndic de Bopack inc. (2025 QCCA 909), the Quebec Court of Appeal reaffirmed the principle that, in matters governed by the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act, the deadline for filing a notice of appeal is ten days from the date of the judgment. This principle is particularly important to bear in mind, as in […]

Who Must Be Represented by a Lawyer? Beware of Sanctions!

In civil matters, self-represented litigants are increasingly common before the Quebec courts. This possibility is expressly provided for in article 23 of the Code of Civil Procedure (“C.C.P.”), which allows any person to be self-represented. However, this right is subject to several exceptions outlined in article 87 C.C.P., which provides mandatory legal representation in certain […]

Latent and Costly Defects

Can buyers of a property with latent defects resell it and claim from their seller the difference between the two transactions? This is one of the questions addressed by the Superior Court in Ouellette c. Blais, 2024 QCCS 1025, upheld by the Court of Appeal on May 26, 2025. The Facts: Charmed by a large […]

If it is Excluded, No Obligation to Defend Rules the Court of Appeal

The Québec Court of Appeal has just issued an important decision for the insurance industry: Intact Insurance Company v. Hydromec Inc., 2025 QCCA 803, overturning a Wellington-type order that had been granted at first instance. A quick reminder: a Wellington motion allows an insured to compel their insurer to take up their defense as soon […]

Rain or Shine: Perhaps Not Between Insurers and Insureds

Human activity has been clearly identified as the main cause behind the rapid rise in greenhouse gas emissions, which in turn is the leading cause of climate change1. Although the Paris Agreement, adopted by 196 countries, including Canada—sought to limit global warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels, scientists now agree that this target […]