Newsletters

101

Recall to Work After the Pandemic: Everything Will Finally be Alright.

Few are the entrepreneurs who did not have to make heart-breaking decisions when the COVID-19 pandemic struck last March: reduction of work hours, temporary wage reductions and, regretfully, terminations and layoffs.

If the governmental emergency measures[1] have offered a certain respite on the hardships endured by the workers and employers alike, both anticipate the eventual return to a certain form of normalcy. Looking forward to the progressive reopening of given economic sectors as of the coming May 4 and 11, here are a few practical tips to keep in mind when planning the recall to work of laid off employees.[2]

Unionized Context

Naturally, the employer must refer to the terms of the collective agreement. Assuming the latter entitles recall privileges for more than six months, the employer must keep on its radar the earliest of the following dates: the anniversary of the layoff or the expiry of the recall privilege. It is indeed at that moment that the employer is bound to pay the compensatory indemnity, unless the employees are not recalled because of a superior force (force majeure) or that they are recalled to work for a period at least equal to the duration of the notice they would have got.

Typically, employers will be required to recall their unionized employees by seniority and, when applicable, enforce their “bumping” right on the positions of their less senior colleagues. Collective agreements usually set a precise and constraining mechanism that employers ought to revise with attention and follow to avoid grievances and arbitrations.

Non-unionized Context

Employers here have a greater freedom of action. Provided that they exercise their management right in a reasonable fashion that is justified by the organizational needs, employers can recall their workers according to various criteria, seniority being merely one among them. As always, employers must however avoid to base their decision on forbidden grounds, for example, in retaliation to the exercise of a right provided by the Act respecting labour standards or in discrimination of right protected by the Charter of human rights and freedoms.

Likewise, employers must ensure that the recall of non-unionized employees is made no later than six months after the layoff, failing which the latter will be considered as a collective dismissal[3] that will expose the employer to pay the required indemnity.

RSS has recently published on the applicable statutory notices and indemnities when a layoff that was meant to be temporary approaches the decisive six-month mark : Achieving Orderly Layoffs During COVID-19

Since each situation is unique and requires a detailed examination, our Labour and Employment Law Group remains available to help entrepreneurs in planning and executing the recall of their workers. [1] The Canada Emergency Response Benefit and the Canada Emergency Wage Subsidy, among others [2] For employers of Quebec jurisdiction. [3] When at least 10 employees of the same establishment during a two-month period are affected.

101

Articles in the same category

Is Planned Obsolescence Finally Coming to an End on October 5, 2025?

While a dishwasher from the 1980s can still run smoothly, many newer models seem to break down after just a few cycles! The 2023 adoption of the Act to Protect Consumers Against Planned Obsolescence and to Promote the Durability, Repairability and Maintenance of Goods1 (hereinafter the “Anti-Obsolescence Act“), which modified the Consumer Protection Act2 (the “C.P.A.“), aimed […]

Caution Regarding Appeal Deadlines in Bankruptcy and Insolvency Matters!

In its recent decision in Syndic de Bopack inc. (2025 QCCA 909), the Quebec Court of Appeal reaffirmed the principle that, in matters governed by the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act, the deadline for filing a notice of appeal is ten days from the date of the judgment. This principle is particularly important to bear in mind, as in […]

Who Must Be Represented by a Lawyer? Beware of Sanctions!

In civil matters, self-represented litigants are increasingly common before the Quebec courts. This possibility is expressly provided for in article 23 of the Code of Civil Procedure (“C.C.P.”), which allows any person to be self-represented. However, this right is subject to several exceptions outlined in article 87 C.C.P., which provides mandatory legal representation in certain […]

Latent and Costly Defects

Can buyers of a property with latent defects resell it and claim from their seller the difference between the two transactions? This is one of the questions addressed by the Superior Court in Ouellette c. Blais, 2024 QCCS 1025, upheld by the Court of Appeal on May 26, 2025. The Facts: Charmed by a large […]

If it is Excluded, No Obligation to Defend Rules the Court of Appeal

The Québec Court of Appeal has just issued an important decision for the insurance industry: Intact Insurance Company v. Hydromec Inc., 2025 QCCA 803, overturning a Wellington-type order that had been granted at first instance. A quick reminder: a Wellington motion allows an insured to compel their insurer to take up their defense as soon […]

Rain or Shine: Perhaps Not Between Insurers and Insureds

Human activity has been clearly identified as the main cause behind the rapid rise in greenhouse gas emissions, which in turn is the leading cause of climate change1. Although the Paris Agreement, adopted by 196 countries, including Canada—sought to limit global warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels, scientists now agree that this target […]