Newsletters

282

Postponement of Business Declarations Until September 2020

Federal corporations, non-profit organizations and cooperatives generally must file their annual returns and pay the annual fees within 60 days of the anniversary date of their creation. However, Corporations Canada has recently announced that all such entities whose anniversary date falls between February 1 and June 1, 2020 now have until September 30, 2020 to do so. Corporations created under a special act of Parliament and which would otherwise have to file between April 1 and June 1, 2020 now also have until September 30, 2020 to do so.

All corporations, partnerships and entrepreneurs carrying on business under a business name in the Province of Quebec must be registered with the Quebec Registrar of Enterprises (REQ), and must file an annual declaration and pay annual fees within prescribed delays (six months from their fiscal year end for corporations and between January 1 and June 15 each year for partnerships and entrepreneurs). The REQ has also recently announced that all enterprises whose filing date falls between March 13 and August 31, 2020 inclusively now have until September 1, 2020 to do so. Any penalties already paid by any enterprise whose filing date fell within that period but had filed late will be refunded automatically. Note however that this does not apply to any updating declarations or annual declarations due prior to March 13, 2020 including those for past years.

Those Quebec enterprises which file their annual declaration and income tax return together (corporations and entrepreneurs) can file their annual declaration at any time, and defer payment of the annual fees until the filing of their income tax return (also extended until September 1, 2020). Those Quebec enterprises which do not file a separate tax return, such as partnerships, must both file their annual declaration and pay their annual fees by or before that date.

Sources:

https://www.registreentreprises.gouv.qc.ca/documents/FAQ_mesure_allegement-COVID19-V.pdf

https://www.registreentreprises.gouv.qc.ca/en/actualites/2020/2020-04-16.aspx

282

Authors

Sharon G. Druker, Ad. E.

Lawyer, Partner and Head of the Corporate Services Department

Articles in the same category

No Notice of Default, No Termination

In Pavage Wemindji Inc. v. Compagnie de Construction et de Développement crie ltée, the Quebec Superior Court emphasized that a valid notice of default (mise en demeure) is not just a formality—it’s a precondition to exercising remedies like contract termination in many cases under Quebec civil law. The Decision The plaintiff, Pavage Wemindji Inc. (“Wemindji”), […]

Public Contracts: When Does a Penalty Clause Cross the Line?

Penalty clauses are a practical tool for owners: instead of having to prove actual losses when a contractor falls short, they can rely on a pre-agreed sum. For contractors, however, the stakes are equally significant — a lump-sum penalty can consume a substantial portion of the contract’s value. Still, the mechanism has its limits. Courts […]

Not So Intelligent!

Since the widespread adoption of artificial intelligence tools, growing concerns have emerged regarding their use in judicial proceedings. Recent decisions have relied on section 342 of the Code of Civil Procedure to sanction parties who make improper use of such tools. More specifically, this provision has been invoked on several occasions to address the use or citation […]

So? Is it settled or not?

In an interim decision in Djaferian v. Spanoudakis,rendered on February 20, 2026, the Superior Court had to determine whether an offer made 15 months earlier, prior to the institution of proceedings, could still be accepted and result in a transaction. Summary of Facts and Timeline The Plaintiff, a co-owner who sustained water damage to his private […]

Office Parties and the Employer’s Duty to Prevent Harassment

In De Sousa and Corporation interactive Eidos, 2026 QCTAT 4, the Quebec Administrative Labour Tribunal (ALT) appears to have broadened the scope of an employer’s obligation to prevent harassment. The decision arose from a complaint filed by a former employee who had been sexually assaulted at her home by a colleague following an office party organized by the […]

Should Economic Losses Be Considered Property Damage?

The Quebec Court of Appeal in Zurich, Compagnie d’assurances SA c. CRT Construction inc., recently overturned the Superior Court’s decision on the interpretation of a construction insurance policy. Facts CRT Construction Inc. (“CRT”) was retained by the City of Montreal (“City”) to perform major construction work at the Atwater water treatment plant. At the City’s request, CRT […]