Newsletters

126

The Court of Appeal Considers the Impact of the COVID-19 Crisis on Contractual Relationships

As of April 16, 2020, there have been some 27 published judgements rendered by Quebec courts and tribunals that mention COVID.

One decision is of particular interest as it addresses the impact that COVID-19 could have going forward. In Naimer c. Naimer, 2020 QCCA 567, Justice Geneviève Marcotte of the Court of Appeal ruled on April 8th to grant part of the Respondents’ Application for safeguard order. Respondents sought to force a share purchase agreement. Justice Marcotte held that the financial climate created by the unique COVID-19 crisis favoured ordering that the transaction go forward.

The Respondents argued that the transaction, which included a $5.5 million payment to them from the Appellants, must go forward:

[T]he Appellants’ refusal to close the transaction is affecting [the Respondents’] ability to earn a living and to fulfill their obligations to their employees and suppliers and that this will “most undoubtedly cause their company to go bankrupt because there is a lack of available funding”. This is in addition to the COVID-19 crisis which has delayed the opening of their business to the end of the month.

Appellants countered by arguing that there was no urgency given the COVID-19 crisis had suspended Respondents’ business operations, regardless of whether they received the $5.5 million payment or not.

Justice Marcotte wrote:

The lack of funding of the Respondents’ business as a result of being “indefinitely” deprived of the payment of substantial sums of money while having forgone any further remuneration or salary, combined with the COVID pandemia militates in favour of granting the order rather than the opposite, as the situation can only logically aggravate the financial pressure brought upon the Respondents.

It appears that our courts will, in certain circumstances, consider the financial impact of COVID-19 on businesses.

Should you have any questions regarding how COVID-19 is affecting your business please reach out to any member of our Business Law Group who will be eager to work with you.

126

Authors

Jean-Pierre Sheppard

Lawyer, Partner and Head of the Civil and Commercial Litigation Group

Articles in the same category

When Love and Construction Contracts Go Out the Window…

In Gélinas v. LG Constructions TR inc., rendered on October 30, 2025, the Court of Appeal comments on the legal framework governing a contractor unilaterally terminating two construction contracts. In particular, the Court clarifies the application of article 2129 of the Civil Code of Quebec (“C.C.Q.”), which provides, when applicable, that a client is bound […]

Finally Properly Interpreted, the Policy Had a Heart

In a recent decision, Morissette v. BMO Société d’assurance vie, the Superior Court reviewed the principles applicable to the interpretation of insurance policies. Facts In June 2003, the Plaintiff took out a health insurance policy (hereinafter “Policy”) with BMO Société d’assurance vie (hereinafter “BMO”). The Policy provides, among other things, that $150,000 will be paid […]

When the Remedy Becomes the Dispute: Medical Liability Under Scrutiny

In the case N.L. v. Mathieu, 2025 QCCS 517, the Superior Court dismissed a medical liability lawsuit filed by a teacher against her former family doctor, in which she sought over $1.9 million in damages. The plaintiff accused her doctor of having inappropriately prescribed medication over several years, without proper follow-up and without informing her […]

Bill 89 and the Future of Labour Disputes in Quebec

Passed by the National Assembly on May 29, 2025, Bill 89 (An Act to give greater consideration to the needs of the population in the event of a strike or a lock-out, hereinafter the “Bill”) will come into force on November 30, 2025. The Bill, which has faced strong opposition from unions, will bring significant […]

Latent Defects: Notice Must Be Given, but to Whom, When and How? The Court of Appeal Answers

On this past September 26, in the context of a claim for latent defects, in the matter of Meyer v. Pichette (Estate of Morin), 2025 QCCA 1193, the Court of appeal confirmed a Superior Court judgment which dismissed proceedings in warranty brought against former vendors as sufficient notice of the defects was not provided prior […]

You Should Not Believe Everything you Read on Social Media…

In a recent decision, Boucal v. Rancourt-Maltais, the Superior Court reviewed the principles applicable to defamation cases. Facts The Defendant is a member of a private Facebook group called “Féministes Bas-St-Laurent”. In this group, Ms. Khadidiatou Yewwi allegedly posted testimony about the Plaintiff. Stating that she was troubled by the testimony and had herself heard […]