Newsletters

174

The Court of Appeal Considers the Impact of the COVID-19 Crisis on Contractual Relationships

As of April 16, 2020, there have been some 27 published judgements rendered by Quebec courts and tribunals that mention COVID.

One decision is of particular interest as it addresses the impact that COVID-19 could have going forward. In Naimer c. Naimer, 2020 QCCA 567, Justice Geneviève Marcotte of the Court of Appeal ruled on April 8th to grant part of the Respondents’ Application for safeguard order. Respondents sought to force a share purchase agreement. Justice Marcotte held that the financial climate created by the unique COVID-19 crisis favoured ordering that the transaction go forward.

The Respondents argued that the transaction, which included a $5.5 million payment to them from the Appellants, must go forward:

[T]he Appellants’ refusal to close the transaction is affecting [the Respondents’] ability to earn a living and to fulfill their obligations to their employees and suppliers and that this will “most undoubtedly cause their company to go bankrupt because there is a lack of available funding”. This is in addition to the COVID-19 crisis which has delayed the opening of their business to the end of the month.

Appellants countered by arguing that there was no urgency given the COVID-19 crisis had suspended Respondents’ business operations, regardless of whether they received the $5.5 million payment or not.

Justice Marcotte wrote:

The lack of funding of the Respondents’ business as a result of being “indefinitely” deprived of the payment of substantial sums of money while having forgone any further remuneration or salary, combined with the COVID pandemia militates in favour of granting the order rather than the opposite, as the situation can only logically aggravate the financial pressure brought upon the Respondents.

It appears that our courts will, in certain circumstances, consider the financial impact of COVID-19 on businesses.

Should you have any questions regarding how COVID-19 is affecting your business please reach out to any member of our Business Law Group who will be eager to work with you.

174

Authors

Jean-Pierre Sheppard

Lawyer, Partner and Head of the Civil and Commercial Litigation Group

Articles in the same category

Ruin Finds a Reason

In Société d’assurance Beneva Inc. c. Ville de Sherbrooke, 2026 QCCA 1301, the Court of Appeal delivers a decision as concise as it is compelling on liability arising from the ruin of an immovable, in a case involving the rupture of a water main. Its impact could extend well beyond underground pipe failures. The Facts […]

There Is No Point in Submitting a Bid Without Conducting Your Research First

In 9329-0146 Québec Inc. (M. Potvin Excavation) v. City of Saint-Constant, 2026 QCCA 1199, the Quebec Court of Appeal reaffirmed the principles governing a contracting authority’s duty to provide information and a bidder’s corresponding duty to seek clarification where necessary. The Facts  In May 2020, the City of Saint-Constant issued a public call for bids […]

2026 World Cup: FIFA Can Commercialise the Tournament, But Not Trust

Introduction With 48 teams, 104 matches, three host countries and 39 days of competition, the 2026 World Cup was already destined to make history because of its sheer scale. On the field, with a transformed VAR system (Video Assistant Referee) and FIFA’s new regulations, every player action was subjected to microscopic scrutiny. Off the field, […]

An Insurer Is Not Required to Uncover What the Insured Was Required to Disclose

In Kayembe-Kabeya v. Industrielle Alliance, assurance et services financiers inc., 2026 QCCS 1714, the Superior Court sets the record straight on the principle of contractual “utmost good faith”. The Facts In September 2019, Ms. Ricady Mede (hereinafter “Mede”) purchased a life insurance policy from Industrielle Alliance (hereinafter the “Insurer”). A few months later, she died of […]

When it’s too late for latent defects…

The Superior Court recently rendered a judgment in Reinert v. Construction Maurice Bilodeau Inc., 2026 QCCS 2276, dealing with timeliness to give notice in cases of latent defects. The Facts In 2013, Ms. Sylvie Reinert and Mr. Denis Leclerc retained Construction Maurice Bilodeau Inc. (“CMB”) for the construction of a residential building on a vacant lot in Lévis. […]

Insurance Math: One Claim, Two Fires, Three Points of Origin, Zero Recovery: When Circumstantial Evidence Speaks Louder Than a Confession

In Chatel v. Desjardins Insurance, 2026 QCCS 712, the Quebec Superior Court reaffirmed a principle of insurance law: direct evidence is not required to establish an intentional fault. Mr. Chatel claimed $532,000 under his homeowner’s insurance policy following two fires that occurred four days apart. The first caused partial damage to his residence, while the second […]