Newsletters

771

Tips When Goods Are Damaged or Lost During Transport

Nine things you need to know about claims resulting from transport by truck, as established by the applicable laws and cases. These tips could be helpful whether you are making a claim or defending against one.

  1. The contract of transport binds the parties and constitutes the law which governs them. It is known as a “Bill of Lading” or under the abbreviation “BOL”, also known as a “connaissement” in French. It includes the names of the sender, recipient and carrier, the location and date of the pick-up, points of origin and destination, and a description of the goods, including the quantity, volume or weight.
  2. The carrier has an obligation to transport the property to its destination. It is an obligation of result, from which it can only be released by proving that the damage was caused by a fortuitous event or the inherent defect of the goods.
  3. When a trucking company subcontracts a leg of the transportation to another trucking company, the two companies are jointly and severally liable if a loss occurs: each of them is 100% responsible for the loss and the shipper can file a claim with either or both for the entire amount of the claim.
  4. All claims are subject to an advance written notice to be given to the carrier. This notice must be sent within 60 days from the date of delivery, whether the loss to the property is apparent or not, or nine months from the date of shipment if the property has not reached its destination. Failure to give this notice constitutes a bar for making a claim.
  5. Provided a notice has been duly forwarded to the carrier within the prescribed time frame, a claim is subject to a three-year prescription period from the date the property was or should have been delivered.
  6. If the value of the goods transported is declared on the bill of lading, this value will be the limit of the trucking company’s liability, not only for the damage to the goods, but also for all other consequential damages.
  7. In the absence of a declared value on the bill of lading, the liability of the trucking company is limited to $4.41 per kilo according to a pre-printed clause appearing in most bills of lading.
  8. If liability is limited to $4.41 per kilo, in virtue of such a clause the limit will be set by taking into consideration the total weight of the shipment, even if the loss is only partial. This value represents the trucking company’s maximum liability for all damage, including consequential damages.
  9. A trucking company is not liable for the loss of high-value goods if it carries these goods without knowing their value.

The above are general recommendations. Many factors, such as the mode of transportation or a foreign origin or destination could dictate the application of different rules. Do not hesitate to contact one of our team members for more information.

771

Authors

Normand Laurendeau

Lawyer, Partner

Articles in the same category

An Automobile Accident Is Not Necessarily an Automobile Accident

Our readers will recall that many decisions have been rendered in recent years analyzing, in very specific cases, what might constitute an automobile accident under the Automobile Insurance Act (AIA). Several decisions have been rendered by both the Supreme Court of Canada[1] and the Court of Appeal[2]. The Administrative Tribunal of Québec (TAQ) recently rendered […]

Nothing Lasts Forever (Not Even a Lifetime Warranty)

In a recent judgment, Hamann v. Matériaux de construction Oldcastle Canada inc., 2024 QCCA 1705, the Québec Court of Appeal (the “CA”) confirmed a ruling of the Québec Superior Court (the “SC”) dismissing an originating application because of the applicant’s failure to institute proceedings within three years of discovering damage to his roof tiles, which […]

1, 2, 3, and the Dishwasher Goes…

No, it was not a former Minister of Energy who made it disappear, but rather a planned obsolescence, carefully concealed in the complexities of the manufacturing components so that the product purchased becomes defective, coercing you to replace it sooner. Fortunately, the Government has responded, and we explain how. Introduction In June 2023, the Minister […]

The Excavator Lost Its Mind, But The Court Of Appeal Did Not!

You may recall our newsletter of July 17, 2023, summarizing a judgment concerning the important burden placed on a manufacturer by the Civil Code of Québec (C.C.Q.). In AIG Insurance Company of Canada et al. v. Mécano Mobile R.L. Inc. et al. 2023 QCCS 1935, the Superior Court dismissed the insurer’s claim against the manufacturer/seller, […]

Fraudulent Statements: Always a Question of Credibility… and of Interest!

In a recent judgment, the Court of Appeal reviews and confirms the Superior Court’s decision in Paul-Hus v. Sun Life Assurance Company, which was commented on in our newsletter of October 31, 2023. Review of the facts On March 13, 2015, Automobiles Illimitées, of which the applicant Paul-Hus is the sole shareholder, applied for a […]

Construction and Loss of the Work: When Does the Countdown Start?

When it comes to prescription, it is often difficult to determine a starting point and a precise calculation, especially when the damage or loss manifests gradually. This issue was analyzed in a very recent judgment rendered by the Honourable Marie Ève Bélanger in Syndicat des Copropriétaires du 600, de la Gare v. Village de la […]