Newsletters

1,067

Tips When Goods Are Damaged or Lost During Transport

Nine things you need to know about claims resulting from transport by truck, as established by the applicable laws and cases. These tips could be helpful whether you are making a claim or defending against one.

  1. The contract of transport binds the parties and constitutes the law which governs them. It is known as a “Bill of Lading” or under the abbreviation “BOL”, also known as a “connaissement” in French. It includes the names of the sender, recipient and carrier, the location and date of the pick-up, points of origin and destination, and a description of the goods, including the quantity, volume or weight.
  2. The carrier has an obligation to transport the property to its destination. It is an obligation of result, from which it can only be released by proving that the damage was caused by a fortuitous event or the inherent defect of the goods.
  3. When a trucking company subcontracts a leg of the transportation to another trucking company, the two companies are jointly and severally liable if a loss occurs: each of them is 100% responsible for the loss and the shipper can file a claim with either or both for the entire amount of the claim.
  4. All claims are subject to an advance written notice to be given to the carrier. This notice must be sent within 60 days from the date of delivery, whether the loss to the property is apparent or not, or nine months from the date of shipment if the property has not reached its destination. Failure to give this notice constitutes a bar for making a claim.
  5. Provided a notice has been duly forwarded to the carrier within the prescribed time frame, a claim is subject to a three-year prescription period from the date the property was or should have been delivered.
  6. If the value of the goods transported is declared on the bill of lading, this value will be the limit of the trucking company’s liability, not only for the damage to the goods, but also for all other consequential damages.
  7. In the absence of a declared value on the bill of lading, the liability of the trucking company is limited to $4.41 per kilo according to a pre-printed clause appearing in most bills of lading.
  8. If liability is limited to $4.41 per kilo, in virtue of such a clause the limit will be set by taking into consideration the total weight of the shipment, even if the loss is only partial. This value represents the trucking company’s maximum liability for all damage, including consequential damages.
  9. A trucking company is not liable for the loss of high-value goods if it carries these goods without knowing their value.

The above are general recommendations. Many factors, such as the mode of transportation or a foreign origin or destination could dictate the application of different rules. Do not hesitate to contact one of our team members for more information.

1,067

Authors

Normand Laurendeau

Lawyer, Partner

Articles in the same category

When it’s too late for latent defects…

The Superior Court recently rendered a judgment in Reinert v. Construction Maurice Bilodeau Inc., 2026 QCCS 2276, dealing with timeliness to give notice in cases of latent defects. The Facts In 2013, Ms. Sylvie Reinert and Mr. Denis Leclerc retained Construction Maurice Bilodeau Inc. (“CMB”) for the construction of a residential building on a vacant lot in Lévis. […]

Insurance Math: One Claim, Two Fires, Three Points of Origin, Zero Recovery: When Circumstantial Evidence Speaks Louder Than a Confession

In Chatel v. Desjardins Insurance, 2026 QCCS 712, the Quebec Superior Court reaffirmed a principle of insurance law: direct evidence is not required to establish an intentional fault. Mr. Chatel claimed $532,000 under his homeowner’s insurance policy following two fires that occurred four days apart. The first caused partial damage to his residence, while the second […]

The Quarrelsome Litigant: When the Right to Sue Becomes a Scourge

Access to the courts is a fundamental right, but what happens when a person uses it not to assert legitimate rights, but to harass others or clog the system to excess? This is quarrelsomeness: the tendency to exercise one’s right to litigate in an excessive or unreasonable manner. Far from being a marginal phenomenon, it […]

Before Buying a Product, Read This: The Rules Are Changing on October 5!

On October 5, 2026, the final amendments to the Regulation amending the Regulation respecting the application of the Consumer Protection Act (the “Regulation“) are expected to come into force, completing the implementation of the new “good working order” warranty in the province of Quebec. When this warranty applies, the merchant or manufacturer will be required to repair […]

No Notice of Default, No Termination

In Pavage Wemindji Inc. v. Compagnie de Construction et de Développement crie ltée, the Quebec Superior Court emphasized that a valid notice of default (mise en demeure) is not just a formality—it’s a precondition to exercising remedies like contract termination in many cases under Quebec civil law. The Decision The plaintiff, Pavage Wemindji Inc. (“Wemindji”), […]

Public Contracts: When Does a Penalty Clause Cross the Line?

Penalty clauses are a practical tool for owners: instead of having to prove actual losses when a contractor falls short, they can rely on a pre-agreed sum. For contractors, however, the stakes are equally significant — a lump-sum penalty can consume a substantial portion of the contract’s value. Still, the mechanism has its limits. Courts […]