Newsletters

1,014

Tips When Goods Are Damaged or Lost During Transport

Nine things you need to know about claims resulting from transport by truck, as established by the applicable laws and cases. These tips could be helpful whether you are making a claim or defending against one.

  1. The contract of transport binds the parties and constitutes the law which governs them. It is known as a “Bill of Lading” or under the abbreviation “BOL”, also known as a “connaissement” in French. It includes the names of the sender, recipient and carrier, the location and date of the pick-up, points of origin and destination, and a description of the goods, including the quantity, volume or weight.
  2. The carrier has an obligation to transport the property to its destination. It is an obligation of result, from which it can only be released by proving that the damage was caused by a fortuitous event or the inherent defect of the goods.
  3. When a trucking company subcontracts a leg of the transportation to another trucking company, the two companies are jointly and severally liable if a loss occurs: each of them is 100% responsible for the loss and the shipper can file a claim with either or both for the entire amount of the claim.
  4. All claims are subject to an advance written notice to be given to the carrier. This notice must be sent within 60 days from the date of delivery, whether the loss to the property is apparent or not, or nine months from the date of shipment if the property has not reached its destination. Failure to give this notice constitutes a bar for making a claim.
  5. Provided a notice has been duly forwarded to the carrier within the prescribed time frame, a claim is subject to a three-year prescription period from the date the property was or should have been delivered.
  6. If the value of the goods transported is declared on the bill of lading, this value will be the limit of the trucking company’s liability, not only for the damage to the goods, but also for all other consequential damages.
  7. In the absence of a declared value on the bill of lading, the liability of the trucking company is limited to $4.41 per kilo according to a pre-printed clause appearing in most bills of lading.
  8. If liability is limited to $4.41 per kilo, in virtue of such a clause the limit will be set by taking into consideration the total weight of the shipment, even if the loss is only partial. This value represents the trucking company’s maximum liability for all damage, including consequential damages.
  9. A trucking company is not liable for the loss of high-value goods if it carries these goods without knowing their value.

The above are general recommendations. Many factors, such as the mode of transportation or a foreign origin or destination could dictate the application of different rules. Do not hesitate to contact one of our team members for more information.

1,014

Authors

Normand Laurendeau

Lawyer, Partner

Articles in the same category

No Notice of Default, No Termination

In Pavage Wemindji Inc. v. Compagnie de Construction et de Développement crie ltée, the Quebec Superior Court emphasized that a valid notice of default (mise en demeure) is not just a formality—it’s a precondition to exercising remedies like contract termination in many cases under Quebec civil law. The Decision The plaintiff, Pavage Wemindji Inc. (“Wemindji”), […]

Public Contracts: When Does a Penalty Clause Cross the Line?

Penalty clauses are a practical tool for owners: instead of having to prove actual losses when a contractor falls short, they can rely on a pre-agreed sum. For contractors, however, the stakes are equally significant — a lump-sum penalty can consume a substantial portion of the contract’s value. Still, the mechanism has its limits. Courts […]

Not So Intelligent!

Since the widespread adoption of artificial intelligence tools, growing concerns have emerged regarding their use in judicial proceedings. Recent decisions have relied on section 342 of the Code of Civil Procedure to sanction parties who make improper use of such tools. More specifically, this provision has been invoked on several occasions to address the use or citation […]

So? Is it settled or not?

In an interim decision in Djaferian v. Spanoudakis,rendered on February 20, 2026, the Superior Court had to determine whether an offer made 15 months earlier, prior to the institution of proceedings, could still be accepted and result in a transaction. Summary of Facts and Timeline The Plaintiff, a co-owner who sustained water damage to his private […]

Office Parties and the Employer’s Duty to Prevent Harassment

In De Sousa and Corporation interactive Eidos, 2026 QCTAT 4, the Quebec Administrative Labour Tribunal (ALT) appears to have broadened the scope of an employer’s obligation to prevent harassment. The decision arose from a complaint filed by a former employee who had been sexually assaulted at her home by a colleague following an office party organized by the […]

Should Economic Losses Be Considered Property Damage?

The Quebec Court of Appeal in Zurich, Compagnie d’assurances SA c. CRT Construction inc., recently overturned the Superior Court’s decision on the interpretation of a construction insurance policy. Facts CRT Construction Inc. (“CRT”) was retained by the City of Montreal (“City”) to perform major construction work at the Atwater water treatment plant. At the City’s request, CRT […]