Labour and Employment Law


“Teleworking”: now and forever?

“I’d like to make a job offer to this candidate. The work will be performed remotely, from home. Can I change this condition at a later date?”

In a decision rendered on 16 March 2023, the Administrative Labour Tribunal confirmed that employers have management rights that allows them to require their employees to return to work in person1. In this case, there was no formal agreement between the employee and the employer regarding teleworking.

Despite the fact that government restrictions have long been lifted, a number of employers have continued to offer their employees the possibility of carrying out their work remotely. According to the case law cited above, in the absence of a specific agreement in this regard, the employer retains the right to require its employees to return to the office.

However, we believe that the unilateral modification of working conditions, such as the possibility of performing work remotely, entails risks of constructive dismissal allegations and complaints. Implicit or verbal agreements may constitute essential working conditions for an employee. As such, any ambiguity may end up being unfavourable to the employer.

Teleworking has become an attractive workforce retention tool. However, a company’s operational needs can change over time. That is why it is important to allow a certain amount of flexibility within the terms and conditions surrounding an employee’s permission to carry out his or her work remotely.

A simple solution for limiting risks and preserving management rights with regard to an employee’s work location is to include a teleworking clause in employment contracts or offers of employment.

The key elements of the “Telework clause”:

  • The location where the employee performs his or her work can be changed unilaterally by the employer;
  • The possibility of performing work remotely is a privilege, not a right;
  • The possibility of performing work remotely is not an essential condition of the employment contract;

These elements may also be included in a telework policy applicable to all employees, which may include employees’ obligations in terms of health and safety at work, directives concerning the protection of confidential data and information, the monitoring and supervision measures used by the employer, and the allocation of costs relating to telework equipment, etc.

In the absence of a specific clause or policy to this effect and in order to limit any risks, we recommend providing a reasonable notice to employees who have been teleworking for some time before changing their working conditions.

For advice tailored to your needs, consult a member of our Labour and Employment Law Group.

1Drake v. Équipement Trans Continental ltée, 2023 QCTAT 1218, par. 27;



Roxanne Cloutier-Peace

Lawyer, Associate

Articles in the same category

Company found guilty of criminal negligence causing death of its truck driver

Last August 11, the Quebec Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal and upheld the trial judge’s decision finding CGF Construction Inc. (the “employer”) guilty of criminal negligence causing death1. The victim in question, a truck driver with over 25 years’ experience, died after losing control of the employer’s heavy container truck, which flipped over on […]

The « appropriate care » provision in disability insurance: an application bearing heavy consequences for the insured

In Desjardins Sécurité financière v. Hébert, the Court of Appeal reminds us of an essential condition often overlooked in order to claim disability insurance benefits: the obligation to be under the care of a medical team and to receive medical treatment, a contextualization of the obligation to mitigate one’s damages. The Court also considers the […]

Fraudulent Statements: Still a Question of Credibility

In Paul-Hus c. Sun Life, Compagnie d’assurance-vie, 2023 QCCS 3890, the Superior Court reminds us of the importance of answering questions truthfully and completely when taking out an insurance policy. Faced with the question of whether the insured intended to deceive the insurer, the Court’s analysis shows that credibility remains a key element. Facts On March […]

Can an insured have one’s cake and be indemnified for it too?

The Sainte-Rose-du-Nord1 decision rendered by the Superior Court presents an interesting scenario that arose in the context of a Wellington motion. The Facts: The Municipality of Sainte-Rose-du-Nord (the “Insured“) held two civil liability policies issued by the Fonds d’assurance des municipalités du Québec (the “Insurer“), one for general liability and the other for errors and […]

Law 25 : an Act to modernize legislative provisions as regards the protection of personal information

Important amendments will be applicable as of September 22, 2023 Law 25 amends the Act respecting the protection of personal information in the private sector (hereinafter the “Act”), applicable to companies in the private sector. While Law 25 itself came into force on September 22, 2022, the most important amendments will come into force as […]

The Flowers, the Pot and the Fire

Can the defendant qualify as part of her father’s house and have the action brought against her dismissed? Does the declaration of co-ownership contain clauses that constitute a waiver to sue the co-owners? These are the questions addressed by the Honourable Alexander Pless, Justice of the Superior Court of Quebec, in Intact compagnie d’assurance v. […]