Can You Slander a Candidate in an Election?

What are the limits of what can be said on social media about a candidate in an election? The question was answered in Laprise c. Simard, 2022 QCCS 1384, a recent decision by Justice Claude Bouchard of the Superior Court.

The Facts

The plaintiff is the candidate for the Conservative Party of Canada in the riding of Beauport–Côte-de-Beaupré–Île d’Orléans–Charlevoix in the last federal election of September 20, 2021.

The night before the vote, the plaintiff, who is the ex spouse of the plaintiff’s husband and who has two children with this man, puts up a post on her Facebook page in which she essentially states that the plaintiff is using the children to promote her candidacy for the election.

The defendant also publishes statements to the effect that the plaintiff has intimidated her and had been vile to her.

The defendant’s posts have been seen by hundreds of people. Some of them did not hesitate to make disparaging comments about the plaintiff, wishing her to be defeated, or describing her alleged behavior as “disgusting” [“dégueulasse”, par 22].

The plaintiff categorically denies the defendant’s allegations. Some of the posts are withdrawn the very day they appeared on Facebook. A letter of demand is sent by the plaintiff and the remaining posts are deleted by the defendant.

The Law

According to the Court, the defendant’s statements are misleading. The advertisements related to the plaintiff’s campaign accurately describe her as the “stepmother” of twins [par 23]. Furthermore, the moment selected by the defendant reveals her real intentions, which are to attack the plaintiff’s image and induce people not to support her nor to vote for her.

Thus, publishing misleading statements exceeds the limits of freedom of expression, therefore becoming defamation. The Court awards $5,000 as compensatory damages, and $1,000 as punitive damages.


Citizens who run for office enter what is commonly referred to as the political arena. They must accept that personal elements of their lives may be the subject of public discussions or commentary. Such are the risks of the job.

However, the political arena is not a free for all. Candidates to elections remain protected by section 4 of the Charter of Human Rights and Freedoms and the Civil Code of Québec, mainly articles 3 and 35. They have among other rights the right to the protection of their dignity their honor and their reputation.

The Supreme Court of Canada stated in 1704604 Ontario Ltd. c. Pointes Protection Association, 2020 SCC 22, that even while freedom of speech is important as a basis of a pluralist democracy, it does not authorize slandering someone else.

These statements are even more relevant in the context of social media.

As this decision illustrates, inappropriate behaviour can have severe consequences before the courts.



Maxime Saint-Onge

Lawyer, Associate

Articles in the same category

The Pool Floats, the Claim Sinks

In the recent decision Piscines Élégance – Québec inc. v. Comtois, 2023 QCCS 4574, the Superior Court reiterates the rules governing a contractor’s obligation to inform his customer in the context of a fixed-price consumer contract for which hefty extras were billed. Piscines Élégance – Québec Inc. (“Piscines“) is claiming from defendant Comtois (“Comtois“) the […]

Apostille: A Simplified Process for International Legalisation of Documents

On January 11, 2024, a new procedure came into effect for the legalisation of documents issued throughout Canada (including Québec) and which are destined to be produced before foreign authorities, whether they be supporting documents for administrative purposes such as the issuing of permits or full-fledged pieces of evidence used as exhibits in international Court […]

The Defect Was Well Hidden, but Is That Enough?

In Cvesper v. Melatti, the Court of Appeal reminds us of the importance of a timely notice to the vendor in cases of latent defects as tardiness or omission to do so may fatally impact the purchaser’s recourse The Facts Essentially, in May 1980, Appellant, Mrs. Cvesper, purchased a property consisting of a multi-unit building […]

Theft Is Not Negligence

In a recent decision, the Quebec Court of Appeal upheld the ruling of the Honourable Chantal Corriveau of the Superior Court that a party cannot benefit from the presumptions of liability in the Civil Code of Quebec when there is no contractual relation between the parties. In such cases, the rules of extra-contractual liability apply, […]

Company Found Guilty of Criminal Negligence Causes Death to Its Truck Driver

Last August 11, the Quebec Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal and upheld the trial judge’s decision finding CGF Construction Inc. (the “employer”) guilty of criminal negligence causing death1. The victim in question, a truck driver with over 25 years’ experience, died after losing control of the employer’s heavy container truck, which flipped over on […]

The « Appropriate Care » Provision in Disability Insurance: An Application Bearing Heavy Consequences for the Insured

In Desjardins Sécurité financière v. Hébert, the Court of Appeal reminds us of an essential condition often overlooked in order to claim disability insurance benefits: the obligation to be under the care of a medical team and to receive medical treatment, a contextualization of the obligation to mitigate one’s damages. The Court also considers the […]