Newsletters

206

A look at some recent amendments to the Canada Labour Code

Your business operates under the Canada Labour Code? You’ll probably want to take note of recent changes on the certification and revocation of a trade union and on the calculation of the holiday pay for general holidays.

Changes in rules on trade unions

On certification — As of June this year, a trade union seeking to represent a group of employees will have to demonstrate to the Canadian Industrial Relations Board that a majority of workers in the unit have voted to be represented by the union. A trade union can no longer be accredited on the spot merely by presenting membership cards. The trade union will first have to demonstrate that at least 40% of the employees in the unit wish to be represent ted by the union. Once this burden has been met, the union will be accredited if, after a secret ballot, a majority of employees elect the union as their representative.

Revocation of certification — An employee claiming to represent at least 40% of the employees in the bargaining unit will be allowed to launch revocation proceedings: this threshold is reduced from 50%. If the Board is satisfied that at least 40% of the employees no longer wish to be represented by the union, it will order a secret ballot on the question. The accreditation will be revoked by a majority vote. However, the vote will not be valid if less than 35% of the employees who are eligible to vote have voted.

Simply stated, as of June 2015, trade unions will have to be more convincing if they want to be and to remain certified representatives of employees.

New methods of calculation of holiday pay

Under certain conditions, an employee is entitled to a holiday with pay on general holidays. Under the Code, there are about ten such days in the year: New Year’s Day, Victoria Day, Canada Day, Labour Day, etc.

Since March 16, the multiple rules applicable to the calculation of the compensation have been replaced with a single general rule for all employees. The new rule will facilitate the employers’ calculation of the compensation for employees with fluctuating pay, while providing benefits to more employees. An employee shall receive holiday pay equal to at least one twentieth of the wages earned in the four-week period immediately preceding the week in which the general holiday occurs, excluding overtime pay.

Employees are not entitled to holiday pay for a general holiday that occurs in their first 30 days of employment.

For more information on these amendments, please contact our Labour and Employment Law Group.

206

Articles in the same category

No Notice of Default, No Termination

In Pavage Wemindji Inc. v. Compagnie de Construction et de Développement crie ltée, the Quebec Superior Court emphasized that a valid notice of default (mise en demeure) is not just a formality—it’s a precondition to exercising remedies like contract termination in many cases under Quebec civil law. The Decision The plaintiff, Pavage Wemindji Inc. (“Wemindji”), […]

Public Contracts: When Does a Penalty Clause Cross the Line?

Penalty clauses are a practical tool for owners: instead of having to prove actual losses when a contractor falls short, they can rely on a pre-agreed sum. For contractors, however, the stakes are equally significant — a lump-sum penalty can consume a substantial portion of the contract’s value. Still, the mechanism has its limits. Courts […]

Not So Intelligent!

Since the widespread adoption of artificial intelligence tools, growing concerns have emerged regarding their use in judicial proceedings. Recent decisions have relied on section 342 of the Code of Civil Procedure to sanction parties who make improper use of such tools. More specifically, this provision has been invoked on several occasions to address the use or citation […]

So? Is it settled or not?

In an interim decision in Djaferian v. Spanoudakis,rendered on February 20, 2026, the Superior Court had to determine whether an offer made 15 months earlier, prior to the institution of proceedings, could still be accepted and result in a transaction. Summary of Facts and Timeline The Plaintiff, a co-owner who sustained water damage to his private […]

Office Parties and the Employer’s Duty to Prevent Harassment

In De Sousa and Corporation interactive Eidos, 2026 QCTAT 4, the Quebec Administrative Labour Tribunal (ALT) appears to have broadened the scope of an employer’s obligation to prevent harassment. The decision arose from a complaint filed by a former employee who had been sexually assaulted at her home by a colleague following an office party organized by the […]

Should Economic Losses Be Considered Property Damage?

The Quebec Court of Appeal in Zurich, Compagnie d’assurances SA c. CRT Construction inc., recently overturned the Superior Court’s decision on the interpretation of a construction insurance policy. Facts CRT Construction Inc. (“CRT”) was retained by the City of Montreal (“City”) to perform major construction work at the Atwater water treatment plant. At the City’s request, CRT […]