Newsletters

138

Courts to Resume Activities as the COVID-19 Crisis Cools Off (Slightly…)

The threat of the coronavirus is far from over. Yet, some activities slowly resume. The Courts, which were almost paralyzed for over two months, are gradually adjusting to the new reality. What will the impact be?

The Superior Court of Quebec is preparing to progressively resume its activities as of June 1, 2020. The goal is to hear half of the trials that had been scheduled for the month of June. Priority will be given as follows:

  • Urgent matters including family matters;
  • Files which may be heard by means other than being present in the Courtroom, via virtual means, videoconferences or telephone conferences;
  • Files where the presence of witnesses is not necessary;
  • Civil matters of short duration.

The Court of Quebec which hear matters less than $85,000 has also established progressive measures for its activities commencing June 1. Cases of an urgent nature as well as those classified as being priority in nature will be dealt with first.

The Courts will have complete discretion to determine which files should be postponed. The ultimate goal is to hear as many cases as possible and to eventually resume normal activities; however, this will depend on the health situation, government restrictions and availability of the judges, courtrooms and personnel.

You will recall that the Minister of Justice in conjunction with the Chief Justice of Quebec had issued a ministerial order on March 15, 2020, for the suspension of all limitation periods until the Government of Quebec announces the end of the current state of emergency, which has been extended until June 3. As the Courts resume their activities progressively, we foresee that the delays which were suspended temporarily, including prescription periods and procedural delays will be lifted. Once the suspension is lifted, those delays are extended by the amount of days the state of emergency lasted.

Please note that the above are general comments: the conditions for the reopening of judicial activities will vary between the various courts and tribunals, and between judicial districts.

If you have any ongoing judicial activity, you should contact your lawyer for specific advice.

138

Authors

Mariella De Stefano

Lawyer, Partner and Co-chair of the Insurance Law Group

Articles in the same category

An Insurer Is Not Required to Uncover What the Insured Was Required to Disclose

In Kayembe-Kabeya v. Industrielle Alliance, assurance et services financiers inc., 2026 QCCS 1714, the Superior Court sets the record straight on the principle of contractual “utmost good faith”. The Facts In September 2019, Ms. Ricady Mede (hereinafter “Mede”) purchased a life insurance policy from Industrielle Alliance (hereinafter the “Insurer”). A few months later, she died of […]

When it’s too late for latent defects…

The Superior Court recently rendered a judgment in Reinert v. Construction Maurice Bilodeau Inc., 2026 QCCS 2276, dealing with timeliness to give notice in cases of latent defects. The Facts In 2013, Ms. Sylvie Reinert and Mr. Denis Leclerc retained Construction Maurice Bilodeau Inc. (“CMB”) for the construction of a residential building on a vacant lot in Lévis. […]

Insurance Math: One Claim, Two Fires, Three Points of Origin, Zero Recovery: When Circumstantial Evidence Speaks Louder Than a Confession

In Chatel v. Desjardins Insurance, 2026 QCCS 712, the Quebec Superior Court reaffirmed a principle of insurance law: direct evidence is not required to establish an intentional fault. Mr. Chatel claimed $532,000 under his homeowner’s insurance policy following two fires that occurred four days apart. The first caused partial damage to his residence, while the second […]

The Quarrelsome Litigant: When the Right to Sue Becomes a Scourge

Access to the courts is a fundamental right, but what happens when a person uses it not to assert legitimate rights, but to harass others or clog the system to excess? This is quarrelsomeness: the tendency to exercise one’s right to litigate in an excessive or unreasonable manner. Far from being a marginal phenomenon, it […]

Before Buying a Product, Read This: The Rules Are Changing on October 5!

On October 5, 2026, the final amendments to the Regulation amending the Regulation respecting the application of the Consumer Protection Act (the “Regulation“) are expected to come into force, completing the implementation of the new “good working order” warranty in the province of Quebec. When this warranty applies, the merchant or manufacturer will be required to repair […]

No Notice of Default, No Termination

In Pavage Wemindji Inc. v. Compagnie de Construction et de Développement crie ltée, the Quebec Superior Court emphasized that a valid notice of default (mise en demeure) is not just a formality—it’s a precondition to exercising remedies like contract termination in many cases under Quebec civil law. The Decision The plaintiff, Pavage Wemindji Inc. (“Wemindji”), […]