Newsletters

124

Courts to Resume Activities as the COVID-19 Crisis Cools Off (Slightly…)

The threat of the coronavirus is far from over. Yet, some activities slowly resume. The Courts, which were almost paralyzed for over two months, are gradually adjusting to the new reality. What will the impact be?

The Superior Court of Quebec is preparing to progressively resume its activities as of June 1, 2020. The goal is to hear half of the trials that had been scheduled for the month of June. Priority will be given as follows:

  • Urgent matters including family matters;
  • Files which may be heard by means other than being present in the Courtroom, via virtual means, videoconferences or telephone conferences;
  • Files where the presence of witnesses is not necessary;
  • Civil matters of short duration.

The Court of Quebec which hear matters less than $85,000 has also established progressive measures for its activities commencing June 1. Cases of an urgent nature as well as those classified as being priority in nature will be dealt with first.

The Courts will have complete discretion to determine which files should be postponed. The ultimate goal is to hear as many cases as possible and to eventually resume normal activities; however, this will depend on the health situation, government restrictions and availability of the judges, courtrooms and personnel.

You will recall that the Minister of Justice in conjunction with the Chief Justice of Quebec had issued a ministerial order on March 15, 2020, for the suspension of all limitation periods until the Government of Quebec announces the end of the current state of emergency, which has been extended until June 3. As the Courts resume their activities progressively, we foresee that the delays which were suspended temporarily, including prescription periods and procedural delays will be lifted. Once the suspension is lifted, those delays are extended by the amount of days the state of emergency lasted.

Please note that the above are general comments: the conditions for the reopening of judicial activities will vary between the various courts and tribunals, and between judicial districts.

If you have any ongoing judicial activity, you should contact your lawyer for specific advice.

124

Authors

Mariella De Stefano

Lawyer, Partner and Co-chair of the Insurance Law Group

Articles in the same category

So? Is it settled or not?

In an interim decision in Djaferian v. Spanoudakis,rendered on February 20, 2026, the Superior Court had to determine whether an offer made 15 months earlier, prior to the institution of proceedings, could still be accepted and result in a transaction. Summary of Facts and Timeline The Plaintiff, a co-owner who sustained water damage to his private […]

Office Parties and the Employer’s Duty to Prevent Harassment

In De Sousa and Corporation interactive Eidos, 2026 QCTAT 4, the Quebec Administrative Labour Tribunal (ALT) appears to have broadened the scope of an employer’s obligation to prevent harassment. The decision arose from a complaint filed by a former employee who had been sexually assaulted at her home by a colleague following an office party organized by the […]

Should Economic Losses Be Considered Property Damage?

The Quebec Court of Appeal in Zurich, Compagnie d’assurances SA c. CRT Construction inc., recently overturned the Superior Court’s decision on the interpretation of a construction insurance policy. Facts CRT Construction Inc. (“CRT”) was retained by the City of Montreal (“City”) to perform major construction work at the Atwater water treatment plant. At the City’s request, CRT […]

The Court of Appeal delves deep into the parties’ intentions and claimant hits a wall…

The Facts In the context of a project for the construction of a ten-storey condo building, the excavation contractor subcontracts the design and installation of a Berlin-type retaining wall (the “Wall”) to Phénix Maritime inc. (“Phénix”) which, in turn, subcontracts the design to Les Investigations Marcel Leblanc inc. (“IML”). Problems arise that substantially delay the […]

New CAI Guidance on Preventing Confidentiality Incidents: A Practical Roadmap for Businesses in Quebec

On January 30, 2026, Quebec’s privacy regulator, the Commission d’accès à l’information (“CAI”), published fresh guidance aimed at strengthening how organizations prevent confidentiality incidents involving personal information. Confidentiality incidents are one of the most significant privacy risks facing organizations today. In Quebec, these incidents are governed by several laws, including the Act respecting the protection […]

Not-So-Latent Defects for a Poorly Equipped Tradesman

In Beaudoin v. Boucher, 2025 QCCA 1646, rendered last December 19, the Court of Appeal upheld the dismissal of an action in latent defects brought by the buyers of a residential property. The Court reiterated the buyer’s duty to pursue further inspections when confronted with serious indicia of defects, particularly where they possess recognized expertise […]