Newsletters

February 15, 2016

313

Think of renewing your employment contracts upon expiry!

Three years ago, you hired a sales rep. You drew an employment agreement defining the compensation, working schedule and vacations. Since the rep was to occupy a strategic position in your company, you inserted non-competition and non-solicitation clauses into the agreement. Finally, you stated that the agreement would be limited to a three-year duration, and that its renewal would require an express agreement.

This contract expired last January 29. However, through the hustle and bustle of daily activity, no one paid attention to the fact that the contract had come to an end, and no one was surprised when the rep showed up for work on February 1 and kept doing his job through the week.

It may have been a mere week’s work, but the legal consequences are significant:

  • By application of art. 2090 C.C.Q., the contract was tacitly renewed for an indeterminate term since the employee continued to carry on his work for five days after the expiry of the term, without objection from the employer; and
  • Following a recent judgment (Traffic Tech inc. c. Kennell, 2016 QCCS 355), the renewal only applies to the essential elements of the contract, such as compensation, working hours and vacations: accessory conditions, such as non-competition and non-solicitation clauses, are not renewed.

This consequence can have a very detrimental impact for the employer. Without non-competition and non-solicitation clauses, an employee who resigns would only be bound by a duty of faithfulness and honesty under art. 2088 C.C.Q., a far cry from explicit clauses. Your sales rep could then resign and work for a competitor after giving you a reasonable notice of termination.

How can you protect your rights?

Since you and your employee are bound by a fixed-term contract (a contract with predetermined termination date), you must select one of two avenues:

  • If you wish to keep the employee at your service, you must renew the contract before it expires, under the terms, if any, that you specified in the contract. You may renew the contract for a duration other than that of the original contract. You may also enter into a contract for an indeterminate term. But you must insert into the new contract all the necessary clauses, such as non-competition and non-solicitation clauses.
  • If you no longer need the employee’s services, you must end the relationship as soon as the contract comes to its term by notifying the employee that the contract has expired and that it will not be renewed.

Drafting an employment contract and managing its renewal are operations for which legal advice can avoid many problems. Do not hesitate to consult with a qualified legal advisor before the costly consequences become inevitable.

Commentary by Jacques Bélanger, from our Labour and Employment Law Group.

313

Articles in the same category

Insurance Law / Newsletters

August 11, 2026

An Insurer Is Not Required to Uncover What the Insured Was Required to Disclose

In Kayembe-Kabeya v. Industrielle Alliance, assurance et services financiers inc., 2026 QCCS 1714, the Superior Court sets the record straight on the principle of contractual “utmost good faith”. The Facts In September 2019, Ms. Ricady Mede (hereinafter “Mede”) purchased a life insurance policy from Industrielle Alliance (hereinafter the “Insurer”). A few months later, she died of […]
Insurance Law / Newsletters

July 31, 2026

When it’s too late for latent defects…

The Superior Court recently rendered a judgment in Reinert v. Construction Maurice Bilodeau Inc., 2026 QCCS 2276, dealing with timeliness to give notice in cases of latent defects. The Facts In 2013, Ms. Sylvie Reinert and Mr. Denis Leclerc retained Construction Maurice Bilodeau Inc. (“CMB”) for the construction of a residential building on a vacant lot in Lévis. […]
Insurance Law / Newsletters

July 28, 2026

Insurance Math: One Claim, Two Fires, Three Points of Origin, Zero Recovery: When Circumstantial Evidence Speaks Louder Than a Confession

In Chatel v. Desjardins Insurance, 2026 QCCS 712, the Quebec Superior Court reaffirmed a principle of insurance law: direct evidence is not required to establish an intentional fault. Mr. Chatel claimed $532,000 under his homeowner’s insurance policy following two fires that occurred four days apart. The first caused partial damage to his residence, while the second […]
Civil and Commercial Litigation

July 27, 2026

The Quarrelsome Litigant: When the Right to Sue Becomes a Scourge

Access to the courts is a fundamental right, but what happens when a person uses it not to assert legitimate rights, but to harass others or clog the system to excess? This is quarrelsomeness: the tendency to exercise one’s right to litigate in an excessive or unreasonable manner. Far from being a marginal phenomenon, it […]
Insurance Law

July 15, 2026

Before Buying a Product, Read This: The Rules Are Changing on October 5!

On October 5, 2026, the final amendments to the Regulation amending the Regulation respecting the application of the Consumer Protection Act (the “Regulation“) are expected to come into force, completing the implementation of the new “good working order” warranty in the province of Quebec. When this warranty applies, the merchant or manufacturer will be required to repair […]
Insurance Law

May 11, 2026

No Notice of Default, No Termination

In Pavage Wemindji Inc. v. Compagnie de Construction et de Développement crie ltée, the Quebec Superior Court emphasized that a valid notice of default (mise en demeure) is not just a formality—it’s a precondition to exercising remedies like contract termination in many cases under Quebec civil law. The Decision The plaintiff, Pavage Wemindji Inc. (“Wemindji”), […]