Newsletters

227

1, 2, 3, and the Dishwasher Goes…

No, it was not a former Minister of Energy who made it disappear, but rather a planned obsolescence, carefully concealed in the complexities of the manufacturing components so that the product purchased becomes defective, coercing you to replace it sooner. Fortunately, the Government has responded, and we explain how.

Introduction

In June 2023, the Minister of Justice, Simon Jolin-Barrette, introduced Bill 29 , “Act to Protect Consumers from Planned Obsolescence and to Promote Durability, Repairability, and Maintenance of Goods[1].

This Bill included, among other things, amendments to the Consumer Protection Act[2] (“C.P.A.”) such as enhancing the legal warranties granted to consumers while introducing the concept of planned obsolescence into Quebec law—a technique that involves “reducing the normal operating life”[3] of a product.

Some interesting modifications in terms of consumer protection have already come into effect, though we will have to wait until October 2026 for a new provision to be implemented.

A Reminder about the C.P.A. and Legal Guarantee of Quality

In addition to the legal guarantee prescribed by the Civil Code of Québec in articles 1726 and following, the C.P.A. also provides a legal guarantee of quality for goods that are the subject of a contract between a consumer and a merchant. Specifically, products must “be durable in normal use for a reasonable length of time, having regard to their price, the terms of the contract and the conditions of their use”[4].

The legal guarantee provides consumers with a reversal of the burden of proof in their favor in the event of a product defect. In the case of an alleged manufacturing defect, it is the burden of the manufacturer, distributor, or the vendor to demonstrate the cause of the defect[5].

2023 – “Seriously Defective” Vehicle

In 2023, the C.P.A. introduced the concept of a “seriously defective” vehicle to provide an additional protection to consumers related to planned obsolescence. This applies to vehicles[6]:

  1. That have, for example, undergone three (3) unsuccessful repair attempts for the same defect under the manufacturer’s warranty, or 12 attempts for unrelated defects;
  2. Where the defects appeared within the first three (3) years after the purchase or lease of the vehicle, with less than 60,000 km driven; and
  3. That are unfit for use.

In such cases, the presence of a hidden defect is presumed.

To our knowledge, this new provision has yet to be the subject of jurisprudence on its merits.

January 2025 – New Financial Penalties

Since January 5, 2025, new financial penalties for non-compliance with the C.P.A. have been in effect.

Depending on the severity of the violation, fines of up to $3,500 for corporations can be imposed for each day of non-compliance with the standards set by the C.P.A.[7]

October 2026 – Introduction of the “Good Working Order” Guarantee

Starting on October 5, 2026, new consumer protections related to planned obsolescence will be enhanced as the “good working order” guarantee comes into effect for certain new goods under sales or long-term rental contracts[8].
This will primarily apply to household appliances, tablets, and mobile phones[9].

Merchants will be required to indicate the duration of this guarantee near the advertised price and provide consumers with information regarding its application[10].

Under the “good working condition” guarantee, merchants and manufacturers will be required to repair a product or cover the repair costs[11].

Conclusion

New significant financial penalties for non-compliance with the C.P.A. are now in effect, along with specific provisions for seriously defective vehicles.

There are now only 18 months for manufacturers and merchants to take necessary action in order to comply with the new provisions of the Act concerning the new “good working condition” guarantee.

Given labor shortages and challenges related to the availability of parts, it will be interesting to continue monitoring the developments and in concreto application of these new provisions.

 

[1] Act to Protect Consumers from Planned Obsolescence and to Promote Durability, Repairability, and Maintenance of Goods, Bill N° 29 (presentation – June 1st, 2023), 1er sess., 43e légiste (QC). [Bill 29]

[2] Consumer Protection Act, RLRQC.P-40.1. [C.P.A.]

[3] Bill 29, art. 14.

[4] C.P.A., art. 38.

[5]ABB Inc. v. Domtar Inc., 2007 CSC 50 (CanLII), [2007] 3 RCS 461.

[6] C.P.A., art. 53.1.

[7] C.P.A., art. 276.1.

[8] C.P.A., 38.1.

[9] C.P.A., art. 38.1.

[10] C.P.A., art. 38.8 et 38.9.

[11] C.P.A., 38.5.

227

Authors

Léonie Gagné

Lawyer, Partner

Articles in the same category

The Court of Appeal delves deep into the parties’ intentions and claimant hits a wall…

The Facts In the context of a project for the construction of a ten-storey condo building, the excavation contractor subcontracts the design and installation of a Berlin-type retaining wall (the “Wall”) to Phénix Maritime inc. (“Phénix”) which, in turn, subcontracts the design to Les Investigations Marcel Leblanc inc. (“IML”). Problems arise that substantially delay the […]

New CAI Guidance on Preventing Confidentiality Incidents: A Practical Roadmap for Businesses in Quebec

On January 30, 2026, Quebec’s privacy regulator, the Commission d’accès à l’information (“CAI”), published fresh guidance aimed at strengthening how organizations prevent confidentiality incidents involving personal information. Confidentiality incidents are one of the most significant privacy risks facing organizations today. In Quebec, these incidents are governed by several laws, including the Act respecting the protection […]

Not-So-Latent Defects for a Poorly Equipped Tradesman

In Beaudoin v. Boucher, 2025 QCCA 1646, rendered last December 19, the Court of Appeal upheld the dismissal of an action in latent defects brought by the buyers of a residential property. The Court reiterated the buyer’s duty to pursue further inspections when confronted with serious indicia of defects, particularly where they possess recognized expertise […]

When Love and Construction Contracts Go Out the Window…

In Gélinas v. LG Constructions TR inc., rendered on October 30, 2025, the Court of Appeal comments on the legal framework governing a contractor unilaterally terminating two construction contracts. In particular, the Court clarifies the application of article 2129 of the Civil Code of Quebec (“C.C.Q.”), which provides, when applicable, that a client is bound […]

Finally Properly Interpreted, the Policy Had a Heart

In a recent decision, Morissette v. BMO Société d’assurance vie, the Superior Court reviewed the principles applicable to the interpretation of insurance policies. Facts In June 2003, the Plaintiff took out a health insurance policy (hereinafter “Policy”) with BMO Société d’assurance vie (hereinafter “BMO”). The Policy provides, among other things, that $150,000 will be paid […]

When the Remedy Becomes the Dispute: Medical Liability Under Scrutiny

In the case N.L. v. Mathieu, 2025 QCCS 517, the Superior Court dismissed a medical liability lawsuit filed by a teacher against her former family doctor, in which she sought over $1.9 million in damages. The plaintiff accused her doctor of having inappropriately prescribed medication over several years, without proper follow-up and without informing her […]