Newsletters

280

1, 2, 3, and the Dishwasher Goes…

No, it was not a former Minister of Energy who made it disappear, but rather a planned obsolescence, carefully concealed in the complexities of the manufacturing components so that the product purchased becomes defective, coercing you to replace it sooner. Fortunately, the Government has responded, and we explain how.

Introduction

In June 2023, the Minister of Justice, Simon Jolin-Barrette, introduced Bill 29 , “Act to Protect Consumers from Planned Obsolescence and to Promote Durability, Repairability, and Maintenance of Goods[1].

This Bill included, among other things, amendments to the Consumer Protection Act[2] (“C.P.A.”) such as enhancing the legal warranties granted to consumers while introducing the concept of planned obsolescence into Quebec law—a technique that involves “reducing the normal operating life”[3] of a product.

Some interesting modifications in terms of consumer protection have already come into effect, though we will have to wait until October 2026 for a new provision to be implemented.

A Reminder about the C.P.A. and Legal Guarantee of Quality

In addition to the legal guarantee prescribed by the Civil Code of Québec in articles 1726 and following, the C.P.A. also provides a legal guarantee of quality for goods that are the subject of a contract between a consumer and a merchant. Specifically, products must “be durable in normal use for a reasonable length of time, having regard to their price, the terms of the contract and the conditions of their use”[4].

The legal guarantee provides consumers with a reversal of the burden of proof in their favor in the event of a product defect. In the case of an alleged manufacturing defect, it is the burden of the manufacturer, distributor, or the vendor to demonstrate the cause of the defect[5].

2023 – “Seriously Defective” Vehicle

In 2023, the C.P.A. introduced the concept of a “seriously defective” vehicle to provide an additional protection to consumers related to planned obsolescence. This applies to vehicles[6]:

  1. That have, for example, undergone three (3) unsuccessful repair attempts for the same defect under the manufacturer’s warranty, or 12 attempts for unrelated defects;
  2. Where the defects appeared within the first three (3) years after the purchase or lease of the vehicle, with less than 60,000 km driven; and
  3. That are unfit for use.

In such cases, the presence of a hidden defect is presumed.

To our knowledge, this new provision has yet to be the subject of jurisprudence on its merits.

January 2025 – New Financial Penalties

Since January 5, 2025, new financial penalties for non-compliance with the C.P.A. have been in effect.

Depending on the severity of the violation, fines of up to $3,500 for corporations can be imposed for each day of non-compliance with the standards set by the C.P.A.[7]

October 2026 – Introduction of the “Good Working Order” Guarantee

Starting on October 5, 2026, new consumer protections related to planned obsolescence will be enhanced as the “good working order” guarantee comes into effect for certain new goods under sales or long-term rental contracts[8].
This will primarily apply to household appliances, tablets, and mobile phones[9].

Merchants will be required to indicate the duration of this guarantee near the advertised price and provide consumers with information regarding its application[10].

Under the “good working condition” guarantee, merchants and manufacturers will be required to repair a product or cover the repair costs[11].

Conclusion

New significant financial penalties for non-compliance with the C.P.A. are now in effect, along with specific provisions for seriously defective vehicles.

There are now only 18 months for manufacturers and merchants to take necessary action in order to comply with the new provisions of the Act concerning the new “good working condition” guarantee.

Given labor shortages and challenges related to the availability of parts, it will be interesting to continue monitoring the developments and in concreto application of these new provisions.

 

[1] Act to Protect Consumers from Planned Obsolescence and to Promote Durability, Repairability, and Maintenance of Goods, Bill N° 29 (presentation – June 1st, 2023), 1er sess., 43e légiste (QC). [Bill 29]

[2] Consumer Protection Act, RLRQC.P-40.1. [C.P.A.]

[3] Bill 29, art. 14.

[4] C.P.A., art. 38.

[5]ABB Inc. v. Domtar Inc., 2007 CSC 50 (CanLII), [2007] 3 RCS 461.

[6] C.P.A., art. 53.1.

[7] C.P.A., art. 276.1.

[8] C.P.A., 38.1.

[9] C.P.A., art. 38.1.

[10] C.P.A., art. 38.8 et 38.9.

[11] C.P.A., 38.5.

280

Authors

Léonie Gagné

Lawyer, Partner

Articles in the same category

An Insurer Is Not Required to Uncover What the Insured Was Required to Disclose

In Kayembe-Kabeya v. Industrielle Alliance, assurance et services financiers inc., 2026 QCCS 1714, the Superior Court sets the record straight on the principle of contractual “utmost good faith”. The Facts In September 2019, Ms. Ricady Mede (hereinafter “Mede”) purchased a life insurance policy from Industrielle Alliance (hereinafter the “Insurer”). A few months later, she died of […]

When it’s too late for latent defects…

The Superior Court recently rendered a judgment in Reinert v. Construction Maurice Bilodeau Inc., 2026 QCCS 2276, dealing with timeliness to give notice in cases of latent defects. The Facts In 2013, Ms. Sylvie Reinert and Mr. Denis Leclerc retained Construction Maurice Bilodeau Inc. (“CMB”) for the construction of a residential building on a vacant lot in Lévis. […]

Insurance Math: One Claim, Two Fires, Three Points of Origin, Zero Recovery: When Circumstantial Evidence Speaks Louder Than a Confession

In Chatel v. Desjardins Insurance, 2026 QCCS 712, the Quebec Superior Court reaffirmed a principle of insurance law: direct evidence is not required to establish an intentional fault. Mr. Chatel claimed $532,000 under his homeowner’s insurance policy following two fires that occurred four days apart. The first caused partial damage to his residence, while the second […]

The Quarrelsome Litigant: When the Right to Sue Becomes a Scourge

Access to the courts is a fundamental right, but what happens when a person uses it not to assert legitimate rights, but to harass others or clog the system to excess? This is quarrelsomeness: the tendency to exercise one’s right to litigate in an excessive or unreasonable manner. Far from being a marginal phenomenon, it […]

Before Buying a Product, Read This: The Rules Are Changing on October 5!

On October 5, 2026, the final amendments to the Regulation amending the Regulation respecting the application of the Consumer Protection Act (the “Regulation“) are expected to come into force, completing the implementation of the new “good working order” warranty in the province of Quebec. When this warranty applies, the merchant or manufacturer will be required to repair […]

No Notice of Default, No Termination

In Pavage Wemindji Inc. v. Compagnie de Construction et de Développement crie ltée, the Quebec Superior Court emphasized that a valid notice of default (mise en demeure) is not just a formality—it’s a precondition to exercising remedies like contract termination in many cases under Quebec civil law. The Decision The plaintiff, Pavage Wemindji Inc. (“Wemindji”), […]