Newsletters

484

The Right to Data Portability in Quebec: What Organizations Need to Know

  1. As of September 22, 2024, the last chapter of a significant shift in data privacy will unfold in Quebec. The right to data portability takes effect under the newly amended Quebec Act respecting the protection of personal information in the private sector (“Quebec Act”). This represents a major development in privacy legislation, aligning closely with the European General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). Section 27 of the Act establishes the right to data portability.

1. This is What You Need to Know:

1.1. What is the Right to Data Portability?

  1. Access and control. The right to data portability is an extension of the right to access. It allows individuals to obtain their personal information from an organization and transfer it to another. This right aims to empower individuals by giving them greater control over their personal information and enhancing competition by simplifying the switch between service providers.

1.2. Key Features of the Quebec Act

  1. Scope of the data portability right. The right pertains to computerized personal information collected from the individual. This excludes information that was created or inferred by the organization, to protect commercial interest of businesses. Further, the right to data portability does not apply to information otherwise exempted by the right of access, like information that would reveal personal information from a third party.
  2. Transfer. Computerized personal information collected from an individual is, at their request, communicated to them or to any person or organization authorized by law to collect such information, at the applicant’s request.
  3. Format. Organizations must provide the data in a structured, commonly used and technological format. Following the European example[1], “a structured, commonly used and technological format” should be understood as the means to comply with minimal requirements facilitating interoperability of the data format provided.
  4. Fees. The Quebec Act does not explicitly prohibit charging fees, contrary to the GDPR.
  5. Destruction. An individual’s exercise of the right to portability does not entail the destruction of the information transferred, which must be kept by organizations to meet their legal or contractual obligations.

2. This is What You Need to Do

2.1. Practical Implications for Organizations

  1. As organizations prepare to comply with the new requirements under the Quebec Act, several issues remain outstanding. Further guidance will be required to fully grasp compliance requirements in Quebec. Yet, the following steps are to be considered.
  2. Update policies. Ensure your privacy policies clearly inform individuals of their right to data portability and how they can exercise it.
  3. Train and raise awareness. Train employees on the new obligations and how to handle requests under the Act. Ensure that your processes are designed to handle these requests efficiently and in compliance with the new regulations.
  4. Implement transfer mechanisms. Develop processes and tools for secure and efficient transfers of information. This might include adopting interoperable formats or utilizing secure messaging systems.
  5. Consider technological solutions. Explore tools and technologies that can facilitate data portability, such as data transfer APIs (Application Programming Interfaces), developing or enabling personal data access points or other personal data management systems.

[1]Guidelines on the right to data portability of the Article 29 Working Party, predecessor of the European Data Protection Board (https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/article29/items/611233/en)

 

484

Authors

Articles in the same category

An Insurer Is Not Required to Uncover What the Insured Was Required to Disclose

In Kayembe-Kabeya v. Industrielle Alliance, assurance et services financiers inc., 2026 QCCS 1714, the Superior Court sets the record straight on the principle of contractual “utmost good faith”. The Facts In September 2019, Ms. Ricady Mede (hereinafter “Mede”) purchased a life insurance policy from Industrielle Alliance (hereinafter the “Insurer”). A few months later, she died of […]

When it’s too late for latent defects…

The Superior Court recently rendered a judgment in Reinert v. Construction Maurice Bilodeau Inc., 2026 QCCS 2276, dealing with timeliness to give notice in cases of latent defects. The Facts In 2013, Ms. Sylvie Reinert and Mr. Denis Leclerc retained Construction Maurice Bilodeau Inc. (“CMB”) for the construction of a residential building on a vacant lot in Lévis. […]

Insurance Math: One Claim, Two Fires, Three Points of Origin, Zero Recovery: When Circumstantial Evidence Speaks Louder Than a Confession

In Chatel v. Desjardins Insurance, 2026 QCCS 712, the Quebec Superior Court reaffirmed a principle of insurance law: direct evidence is not required to establish an intentional fault. Mr. Chatel claimed $532,000 under his homeowner’s insurance policy following two fires that occurred four days apart. The first caused partial damage to his residence, while the second […]

The Quarrelsome Litigant: When the Right to Sue Becomes a Scourge

Access to the courts is a fundamental right, but what happens when a person uses it not to assert legitimate rights, but to harass others or clog the system to excess? This is quarrelsomeness: the tendency to exercise one’s right to litigate in an excessive or unreasonable manner. Far from being a marginal phenomenon, it […]

Before Buying a Product, Read This: The Rules Are Changing on October 5!

On October 5, 2026, the final amendments to the Regulation amending the Regulation respecting the application of the Consumer Protection Act (the “Regulation“) are expected to come into force, completing the implementation of the new “good working order” warranty in the province of Quebec. When this warranty applies, the merchant or manufacturer will be required to repair […]

No Notice of Default, No Termination

In Pavage Wemindji Inc. v. Compagnie de Construction et de Développement crie ltée, the Quebec Superior Court emphasized that a valid notice of default (mise en demeure) is not just a formality—it’s a precondition to exercising remedies like contract termination in many cases under Quebec civil law. The Decision The plaintiff, Pavage Wemindji Inc. (“Wemindji”), […]