Newsletters

183

Employee Mental Health on Return to Work: A Component to Consider

On April 28, 2020, the Quebec government announced a gradual recovery in economic activity. Some reopenings will take place in manufacturing, construction and retail.

As an employer, you are required by the Act respecting occupational health and safety to take the necessary steps to protect your workers’ health and safety. Therefore, not only will you have to follow the health guidelines provided by the government when you resume your activities, but you will also have to ensure that your employees comply with them.

In addition to following health guidelines, your obligation extends to protecting the mental health of your workers. Risks caused by the pandemic may include stress, anxiety, and depression. One can anticipate a difficult return in terms of motivation, and an increased need on the part of workers for autonomy and flexibility of working hours.

Stress, anxiety and depression can have physical, emotional and behavioural impacts. At stake in the return to work is how an employer should respond to employees with such symptoms. To this end, the CNESST has produced a checklist-type reminder of the precautions that an employer should take to prepare for the day where employees come back to the workplace.

For example, an employee on a construction site who has difficulty concentrating or is irritable or aggressive can pose a health and safety hazard to himself and his colleagues. It is therefore important to perform certain checks to take the necessary measures to remedy the situation, whether by ordering the worker to return home or by providing assistance.

Note that a mental health problem may, in some cases, be considered a disability within the meaning of section 10 of the Charter of Human Rights and Freedoms [Charter]. More specifically, section 16 of the Charter lists a few situations in which an employer cannot discriminate on the basis of a disability:

16. No one may practise discrimination in respect of the hiring, apprenticeship, duration of the probationary period, vocational training, promotion, transfer, displacement, laying-off, suspension, dismissal or conditions of employment of a person or in the establishment of categories or classes of employment.

Thus, when relaunching your activities, you should keep in mind the possibility of having to implement reasonable accommodations for some of your employees. Otherwise, you may be subject to complaints before the CNESST or the Commission des droits de la personne et des droits de la jeunesse.

We also recommend that you develop your plan to relaunch your business as quickly as possible. RSS’s Labour and Employment team can assist you with this, ensuring that you meet your legal obligations in terms of occupational health and safety, to prevent potential complaints.

183

Articles in the same category

No Notice of Default, No Termination

In Pavage Wemindji Inc. v. Compagnie de Construction et de Développement crie ltée, the Quebec Superior Court emphasized that a valid notice of default (mise en demeure) is not just a formality—it’s a precondition to exercising remedies like contract termination in many cases under Quebec civil law. The Decision The plaintiff, Pavage Wemindji Inc. (“Wemindji”), […]

Public Contracts: When Does a Penalty Clause Cross the Line?

Penalty clauses are a practical tool for owners: instead of having to prove actual losses when a contractor falls short, they can rely on a pre-agreed sum. For contractors, however, the stakes are equally significant — a lump-sum penalty can consume a substantial portion of the contract’s value. Still, the mechanism has its limits. Courts […]

Not So Intelligent!

Since the widespread adoption of artificial intelligence tools, growing concerns have emerged regarding their use in judicial proceedings. Recent decisions have relied on section 342 of the Code of Civil Procedure to sanction parties who make improper use of such tools. More specifically, this provision has been invoked on several occasions to address the use or citation […]

So? Is it settled or not?

In an interim decision in Djaferian v. Spanoudakis,rendered on February 20, 2026, the Superior Court had to determine whether an offer made 15 months earlier, prior to the institution of proceedings, could still be accepted and result in a transaction. Summary of Facts and Timeline The Plaintiff, a co-owner who sustained water damage to his private […]

Office Parties and the Employer’s Duty to Prevent Harassment

In De Sousa and Corporation interactive Eidos, 2026 QCTAT 4, the Quebec Administrative Labour Tribunal (ALT) appears to have broadened the scope of an employer’s obligation to prevent harassment. The decision arose from a complaint filed by a former employee who had been sexually assaulted at her home by a colleague following an office party organized by the […]

Should Economic Losses Be Considered Property Damage?

The Quebec Court of Appeal in Zurich, Compagnie d’assurances SA c. CRT Construction inc., recently overturned the Superior Court’s decision on the interpretation of a construction insurance policy. Facts CRT Construction Inc. (“CRT”) was retained by the City of Montreal (“City”) to perform major construction work at the Atwater water treatment plant. At the City’s request, CRT […]