{"id":17157,"date":"2020-07-07T07:16:44","date_gmt":"2020-07-07T12:16:44","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.rsslex.com\/publications\/snc-lavalin-inc-c-deguise-the-rights-of-the-injured-third-party-at-the-centre-of-the-decision\/"},"modified":"2022-01-24T11:20:38","modified_gmt":"2022-01-24T16:20:38","slug":"20200707_snc-lavalin-inc-c-deguise-the-rights-of-the-injured-third-party-at-the-centre-of-the-decision","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.rsslex.com\/en\/bulletins-en\/20200707_snc-lavalin-inc-c-deguise-the-rights-of-the-injured-third-party-at-the-centre-of-the-decision\/","title":{"rendered":"<em>SNC-Lavalin inc. c. Deguise<\/em>: The Rights of the Injured Third Party at the Centre of the Decision"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><!-- \n<strong>By <a href=\"https:\/\/www.rsslex.com\/avocats\/profil-individuel-des-avocats\/sbeauchamp\/\">St\u00e9phanie Beauchamp<\/a>, from our Insurance Law Practice Group<\/strong>\n --><\/p>\n<table style=\"border-color: #000000;\" border=\"1\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td><em>On April 6, the Court of Appeal of Qu\u00e9bec rendered its decision in SNC-Lavalin inc. (Terratech inc. et SNC-Lavalin Environnement inc.) c. Deguise, <a href=\"https:\/\/canlii.ca\/t\/j6bqz\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>2020\u00a0QCCA\u00a0495<\/em><\/a>.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>Considering the importance of this decision for both the construction and insurance industries, RSS offers a series of newsletters discussing the main issues at stake. This is one segment of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.rsslex.com\/en\/publications-en\/snc-lavalin_c_deguise\/\"><i>the complete series found here.<\/i><\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p><!-- July 7, 2020\u00a0\u2014\u00a0 -->Among the actors involved in this legal saga, is SNC-Lavalin [\u201cSNC\u201d], which was covered by a complex insurance structure involving several insurers, designated as an \u201cinsurance tower\u201d. This structure provided that each insurance policy was triggered following a pre-established sequence and applied until the exhaustion of its insurance amount, then triggering the next policy of the tower. This tower was based on a reference policy, which stated the general terms and conditions to be respected by the insurers, creating a system called \u201cfollow form\u201d. SNC had subscribed a worldwide coverage, aiming for a protection in all of its business territories.<\/p>\n<h2>Law applicable to excess insurance policies<\/h2>\n<p>Zurich Insurance Company [\u201cZurich\u201d], one of the excess insurers of the tower, appealed from the decision rendered by the Superior Court, arguing that its policies were governed by the law of Ontario. Based on this argument, the injured third persons would not have any direct right of action against Zurich and the interest on the proceeds of the insurance could not be deducted from the insurance amount, contrary to articles 2500, 2501 and 2503 of the <i>Civil Code of Qu\u00e9bec<\/i> [CCQ].<\/p>\n<p>While the reference policy provided that any dispute arising out of the policy should be decided based on Quebec law, Zurich\u2019s policy provided that the Ontario law shall apply. The Court of Appeal chose not to comment on the impact of these two contradictory provisions within the same insurance tower. Instead, the Court analyzed Zurich\u2019s argument in light of article 3119 par. 1 CCQ, which states:<\/p>\n<table>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"10%\"><\/td>\n<td width=\"80%\">3119. Notwithstanding any agreement to the contrary, a contract of insurance covering property or an interest situated in Qu\u00e9bec, or that is subscribed in Qu\u00e9bec by a person resident in Qu\u00e9bec, is governed by the law of Qu\u00e9bec if the policyholder applies for the insurance in Qu\u00e9bec or the insurer signs or delivers the policy in Qu\u00e9bec.<\/td>\n<td width=\"10%\"><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p>During the hearing, Zurich admitted that its insurance contract was covering an interest situated in Quebec, where SNC\u2019s head office was located.<\/p>\n<p>Moreover, evidence showed that Zurich\u2019s policy was delivered in Quebec. Even though Zurich was generally sending its policies to the broker\u2019s offices in Toronto, the latter was instructed to forward the policies to SNC\u2019s offices, in Montr\u00e9al. Thus, the broker was acting as Zurich\u2019s mandatary while delivering the policies in Quebec.<\/p>\n<p>The criteria of article 3119 CCQ being filled, the policies are governed by Quebec law and the choice of jurisdiction clause must be excluded. Therefore, Zurich is subject to Quebec\u2019s rules of public order with regard to insurance, which means that the injured third persons had the right to bring an action directly against the insurer and that the interest could not be deducted from the insurance amount.<\/p>\n<p>Defence costs and injured third persons\u2019 rights<\/p>\n<p>Article 2503 CCQ provides that defence costs are borne by the insurer and cannot be deducted from the proceeds of the insurance, which are applied exclusively to the payment of injured third persons.<\/p>\n<p>This provision was discussed in Deguise. The issue was to determine if the costs incurred to defend the insured against a claim in Alberta, where the deduction of the defence costs are allowed, could be deducted from the proceeds of the insurance available for the compensation of the injured third persons in Quebec.<\/p>\n<p>The Court of first instance had concluded that SNC and its insurers had agreed to process each claim in accordance with the law of the place where it was filed. Thus, if Alberta law allowed the deduction of defence costs from the proceeds of insurance, these costs were also deducted from the proceeds of insurance that remained available for third persons in Quebec who filed a claim within the same insurance period.<\/p>\n<p>The Court of Appeal did not agree with this decision and considered that it did not take into consideration the injured third persons\u2019 rights in Quebec.<\/p>\n<p>According to article 3119 CCQ cited above, the tower\u2019s insurance policies are governed by Quebec law. Therefore, they are subject to its insurance rules, including article 2500 CCQ, which provides that \u201cthe proceeds of the insurance are applied exclusively to the payment of injured third persons\u201d. The Court confirms that this rule exists to protect the third persons\u2019 rights and falls under absolute public order. In conjunction with article 2503 par. 2 CCQ, this provision prevents the amount of the insurance intended for third persons from being reduced by defence costs of the insured, regardless of where these costs were incurred.<\/p>\n<p>Moreover, the Court notes that the reference policy provides that the resolution of any dispute arising out of the policy shall be decided in accordance with Quebec law.<\/p>\n<p>The Court mentions that in any event, foreign law could not have an extraterritorial application in Quebec towards rules of public order, such as the ones protecting the injured third persons.<\/p>\n<p>However, article 2463 CCQ allows the compensations paid to other claimants to be deducted from the proceeds of insurance intended to Quebec claimants.<br \/>\n<!-- \n<a href=\"https:\/\/www.rsslex.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/13_Deguise_EN.pdf\">Click here for a PDF version<\/a>\n --><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>On April 6, the Court of Appeal of Qu\u00e9bec rendered its decision in SNC-Lavalin inc. (Terratech inc. et SNC-Lavalin Environnement inc.) c. Deguise, 2020\u00a0QCCA\u00a0495. Considering the importance of this decision for both the construction and insurance industries, RSS offers a series of newsletters discussing the main issues at stake. This is one segment of the [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":18,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[242,50],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-17157","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-insurance-law-en","category-bulletins-en"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.5 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>SNC-Lavalin inc. c. Deguise: The Rights of the Injured Third Party at the Centre of the Decision - RSS - Robinson Sheppard Shapiro<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.rsslex.com\/en\/bulletins-en\/20200707_snc-lavalin-inc-c-deguise-the-rights-of-the-injured-third-party-at-the-centre-of-the-decision\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"SNC-Lavalin inc. c. Deguise: The Rights of the Injured Third Party at the Centre of the Decision - RSS - Robinson Sheppard Shapiro\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"On April 6, the Court of Appeal of Qu\u00e9bec rendered its decision in SNC-Lavalin inc. (Terratech inc. et SNC-Lavalin Environnement inc.) c. Deguise, 2020\u00a0QCCA\u00a0495. Considering the importance of this decision for both the construction and insurance industries, RSS offers a series of newsletters discussing the main issues at stake. This is one segment of the [&hellip;]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.rsslex.com\/en\/bulletins-en\/20200707_snc-lavalin-inc-c-deguise-the-rights-of-the-injured-third-party-at-the-centre-of-the-decision\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"RSS - Robinson Sheppard Shapiro\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/rsslex\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2020-07-07T12:16:44+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2022-01-24T16:20:38+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.rsslex.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/Placeholder-News.png\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1000\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"500\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/png\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"V\u00e9ronique Nollet\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"V\u00e9ronique Nollet\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.rsslex.com\\\/en\\\/bulletins-en\\\/20200707_snc-lavalin-inc-c-deguise-the-rights-of-the-injured-third-party-at-the-centre-of-the-decision\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.rsslex.com\\\/en\\\/bulletins-en\\\/20200707_snc-lavalin-inc-c-deguise-the-rights-of-the-injured-third-party-at-the-centre-of-the-decision\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"V\u00e9ronique Nollet\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.rsslex.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0d1c0fa6dcd13392d3db5c5246c97d9d\"},\"headline\":\"SNC-Lavalin inc. c. Deguise: The Rights of the Injured Third Party at the Centre of the Decision\",\"datePublished\":\"2020-07-07T12:16:44+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2022-01-24T16:20:38+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.rsslex.com\\\/en\\\/bulletins-en\\\/20200707_snc-lavalin-inc-c-deguise-the-rights-of-the-injured-third-party-at-the-centre-of-the-decision\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":905,\"articleSection\":[\"Insurance Law\",\"Newsletters\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.rsslex.com\\\/en\\\/bulletins-en\\\/20200707_snc-lavalin-inc-c-deguise-the-rights-of-the-injured-third-party-at-the-centre-of-the-decision\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.rsslex.com\\\/en\\\/bulletins-en\\\/20200707_snc-lavalin-inc-c-deguise-the-rights-of-the-injured-third-party-at-the-centre-of-the-decision\\\/\",\"name\":\"SNC-Lavalin inc. c. Deguise: The Rights of the Injured Third Party at the Centre of the Decision - RSS - Robinson Sheppard Shapiro\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.rsslex.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2020-07-07T12:16:44+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2022-01-24T16:20:38+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.rsslex.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0d1c0fa6dcd13392d3db5c5246c97d9d\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.rsslex.com\\\/en\\\/bulletins-en\\\/20200707_snc-lavalin-inc-c-deguise-the-rights-of-the-injured-third-party-at-the-centre-of-the-decision\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.rsslex.com\\\/en\\\/bulletins-en\\\/20200707_snc-lavalin-inc-c-deguise-the-rights-of-the-injured-third-party-at-the-centre-of-the-decision\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.rsslex.com\\\/en\\\/bulletins-en\\\/20200707_snc-lavalin-inc-c-deguise-the-rights-of-the-injured-third-party-at-the-centre-of-the-decision\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"RSS\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.rsslex.com\\\/en\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"SNC-Lavalin inc. c. Deguise: The Rights of the Injured Third Party at the Centre of the Decision\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.rsslex.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.rsslex.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"RSS - Robinson Sheppard Shapiro\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.rsslex.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.rsslex.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0d1c0fa6dcd13392d3db5c5246c97d9d\",\"name\":\"V\u00e9ronique Nollet\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/af968db4245bdb856024dfe4e11f0e5e1840e95112c36381c59713dc230c3a3c?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/af968db4245bdb856024dfe4e11f0e5e1840e95112c36381c59713dc230c3a3c?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/af968db4245bdb856024dfe4e11f0e5e1840e95112c36381c59713dc230c3a3c?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"V\u00e9ronique Nollet\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"SNC-Lavalin inc. c. Deguise: The Rights of the Injured Third Party at the Centre of the Decision - RSS - Robinson Sheppard Shapiro","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.rsslex.com\/en\/bulletins-en\/20200707_snc-lavalin-inc-c-deguise-the-rights-of-the-injured-third-party-at-the-centre-of-the-decision\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"SNC-Lavalin inc. c. Deguise: The Rights of the Injured Third Party at the Centre of the Decision - RSS - Robinson Sheppard Shapiro","og_description":"On April 6, the Court of Appeal of Qu\u00e9bec rendered its decision in SNC-Lavalin inc. (Terratech inc. et SNC-Lavalin Environnement inc.) c. Deguise, 2020\u00a0QCCA\u00a0495. Considering the importance of this decision for both the construction and insurance industries, RSS offers a series of newsletters discussing the main issues at stake. This is one segment of the [&hellip;]","og_url":"https:\/\/www.rsslex.com\/en\/bulletins-en\/20200707_snc-lavalin-inc-c-deguise-the-rights-of-the-injured-third-party-at-the-centre-of-the-decision\/","og_site_name":"RSS - Robinson Sheppard Shapiro","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/rsslex\/","article_published_time":"2020-07-07T12:16:44+00:00","article_modified_time":"2022-01-24T16:20:38+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1000,"height":500,"url":"https:\/\/www.rsslex.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/Placeholder-News.png","type":"image\/png"}],"author":"V\u00e9ronique Nollet","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"V\u00e9ronique Nollet","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.rsslex.com\/en\/bulletins-en\/20200707_snc-lavalin-inc-c-deguise-the-rights-of-the-injured-third-party-at-the-centre-of-the-decision\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.rsslex.com\/en\/bulletins-en\/20200707_snc-lavalin-inc-c-deguise-the-rights-of-the-injured-third-party-at-the-centre-of-the-decision\/"},"author":{"name":"V\u00e9ronique Nollet","@id":"https:\/\/www.rsslex.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/0d1c0fa6dcd13392d3db5c5246c97d9d"},"headline":"SNC-Lavalin inc. c. Deguise: The Rights of the Injured Third Party at the Centre of the Decision","datePublished":"2020-07-07T12:16:44+00:00","dateModified":"2022-01-24T16:20:38+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.rsslex.com\/en\/bulletins-en\/20200707_snc-lavalin-inc-c-deguise-the-rights-of-the-injured-third-party-at-the-centre-of-the-decision\/"},"wordCount":905,"articleSection":["Insurance Law","Newsletters"],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.rsslex.com\/en\/bulletins-en\/20200707_snc-lavalin-inc-c-deguise-the-rights-of-the-injured-third-party-at-the-centre-of-the-decision\/","url":"https:\/\/www.rsslex.com\/en\/bulletins-en\/20200707_snc-lavalin-inc-c-deguise-the-rights-of-the-injured-third-party-at-the-centre-of-the-decision\/","name":"SNC-Lavalin inc. c. Deguise: The Rights of the Injured Third Party at the Centre of the Decision - RSS - Robinson Sheppard Shapiro","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.rsslex.com\/en\/#website"},"datePublished":"2020-07-07T12:16:44+00:00","dateModified":"2022-01-24T16:20:38+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.rsslex.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/0d1c0fa6dcd13392d3db5c5246c97d9d"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.rsslex.com\/en\/bulletins-en\/20200707_snc-lavalin-inc-c-deguise-the-rights-of-the-injured-third-party-at-the-centre-of-the-decision\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.rsslex.com\/en\/bulletins-en\/20200707_snc-lavalin-inc-c-deguise-the-rights-of-the-injured-third-party-at-the-centre-of-the-decision\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.rsslex.com\/en\/bulletins-en\/20200707_snc-lavalin-inc-c-deguise-the-rights-of-the-injured-third-party-at-the-centre-of-the-decision\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"RSS","item":"https:\/\/www.rsslex.com\/en\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"SNC-Lavalin inc. c. Deguise: The Rights of the Injured Third Party at the Centre of the Decision"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.rsslex.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.rsslex.com\/en\/","name":"RSS - Robinson Sheppard Shapiro","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.rsslex.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.rsslex.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/0d1c0fa6dcd13392d3db5c5246c97d9d","name":"V\u00e9ronique Nollet","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/af968db4245bdb856024dfe4e11f0e5e1840e95112c36381c59713dc230c3a3c?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/af968db4245bdb856024dfe4e11f0e5e1840e95112c36381c59713dc230c3a3c?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/af968db4245bdb856024dfe4e11f0e5e1840e95112c36381c59713dc230c3a3c?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"V\u00e9ronique Nollet"}}]}},"views":214,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rsslex.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17157","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rsslex.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rsslex.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rsslex.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/18"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rsslex.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=17157"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.rsslex.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17157\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":21217,"href":"https:\/\/www.rsslex.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17157\/revisions\/21217"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rsslex.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=17157"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rsslex.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=17157"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rsslex.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=17157"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}