{"id":16903,"date":"2018-12-19T12:07:46","date_gmt":"2018-12-19T17:07:46","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.rsslex.com\/actualites\/the-court-of-appeal-agrees-with-elisabeth-laroche-in-a-professional-responsibility-case\/"},"modified":"2025-03-04T10:32:38","modified_gmt":"2025-03-04T15:32:38","slug":"20181219_the-court-of-appeal-agrees-with-elisabeth-laroche-in-a-professional-responsibility-case","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.rsslex.com\/en\/news\/20181219_the-court-of-appeal-agrees-with-elisabeth-laroche-in-a-professional-responsibility-case\/","title":{"rendered":"The Court of Appeal agrees with \u00c9lisabeth Laroche in a professional responsibility case"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><!-- December 19, 2018&nbsp;&mdash; -->In <i>Cansica Holding Inc. c. Boidman<\/i>, <a href=\"https:\/\/canlii.ca\/t\/hwmmr\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2018 QCCA 2130<\/a>, a decision rendered on December 14, the Court of Appeal endorsed \u00c9lisabeth Laroche\u2019s reasoning in defending a lawyer against a claim for professional responsibility.<\/p>\n<p>The lawyer had omitted to file a suit to recover amounts owing to his clients, thus precluding them to claim their debt on account of prescription. \u00c9lisabeth proved that even if a suit had been filed, most of the plaintiffs\u2019 debt could not have been recovered, considering the burden of proof.<\/p>\n<p>As a result, there was no causation between the lawyer\u2019s omission and the losses of his clients. And since causation is an essential element of professional responsibility, the claim against the lawyer was dismissed.<\/p>\n<p>The plaintiffs also raised the \u201closs of chance\u201d theory, seeking compensation for \u201cthe damage which results from the loss of an opportunity either to realize a benefit or to avoid an injury\u201d. The Court rejected this argument on the basis of a 1991 decision where the Supreme Court of Canada stated \u201cit is only in exceptional loss of chance cases that a judge is presented with a situation where the damage can only be understood in probabilistic or statistical terms and where it is impossible to evaluate sensibly whether or how the chance would have been realized in that particular case.\u201d<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In Cansica Holding Inc. c. Boidman, 2018 QCCA 2130, a decision rendered on December 14, the Court of Appeal endorsed \u00c9lisabeth Laroche\u2019s reasoning in defending a lawyer against a claim for professional responsibility. The lawyer had omitted to file a suit to recover amounts owing to his clients, thus precluding them to claim their debt [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":18,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[49,237,234],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-16903","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news","category-civil-and-commercial-litigation","category-insurance-law"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.4 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>The Court of Appeal agrees with \u00c9lisabeth Laroche in a professional responsibility case - RSS - Robinson Sheppard Shapiro<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.rsslex.com\/en\/news\/20181219_the-court-of-appeal-agrees-with-elisabeth-laroche-in-a-professional-responsibility-case\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"The Court of Appeal agrees with \u00c9lisabeth Laroche in a professional responsibility case - RSS - Robinson Sheppard Shapiro\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"In Cansica Holding Inc. c. Boidman, 2018 QCCA 2130, a decision rendered on December 14, the Court of Appeal endorsed \u00c9lisabeth Laroche\u2019s reasoning in defending a lawyer against a claim for professional responsibility. The lawyer had omitted to file a suit to recover amounts owing to his clients, thus precluding them to claim their debt [&hellip;]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.rsslex.com\/en\/news\/20181219_the-court-of-appeal-agrees-with-elisabeth-laroche-in-a-professional-responsibility-case\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"RSS - Robinson Sheppard Shapiro\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/rsslex\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-12-19T17:07:46+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-03-04T15:32:38+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.rsslex.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/Placeholder-News.png\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1000\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"500\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/png\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"V\u00e9ronique Nollet\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"V\u00e9ronique Nollet\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.rsslex.com\\\/en\\\/news\\\/20181219_the-court-of-appeal-agrees-with-elisabeth-laroche-in-a-professional-responsibility-case\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.rsslex.com\\\/en\\\/news\\\/20181219_the-court-of-appeal-agrees-with-elisabeth-laroche-in-a-professional-responsibility-case\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"V\u00e9ronique Nollet\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.rsslex.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0d1c0fa6dcd13392d3db5c5246c97d9d\"},\"headline\":\"The Court of Appeal agrees with \u00c9lisabeth Laroche in a professional responsibility case\",\"datePublished\":\"2018-12-19T17:07:46+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-03-04T15:32:38+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.rsslex.com\\\/en\\\/news\\\/20181219_the-court-of-appeal-agrees-with-elisabeth-laroche-in-a-professional-responsibility-case\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":230,\"articleSection\":[\"Announcements\",\"Civil and Commercial Litigation\",\"Insurance Law\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.rsslex.com\\\/en\\\/news\\\/20181219_the-court-of-appeal-agrees-with-elisabeth-laroche-in-a-professional-responsibility-case\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.rsslex.com\\\/en\\\/news\\\/20181219_the-court-of-appeal-agrees-with-elisabeth-laroche-in-a-professional-responsibility-case\\\/\",\"name\":\"The Court of Appeal agrees with \u00c9lisabeth Laroche in a professional responsibility case - RSS - Robinson Sheppard Shapiro\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.rsslex.com\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2018-12-19T17:07:46+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-03-04T15:32:38+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.rsslex.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0d1c0fa6dcd13392d3db5c5246c97d9d\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.rsslex.com\\\/en\\\/news\\\/20181219_the-court-of-appeal-agrees-with-elisabeth-laroche-in-a-professional-responsibility-case\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.rsslex.com\\\/en\\\/news\\\/20181219_the-court-of-appeal-agrees-with-elisabeth-laroche-in-a-professional-responsibility-case\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.rsslex.com\\\/en\\\/news\\\/20181219_the-court-of-appeal-agrees-with-elisabeth-laroche-in-a-professional-responsibility-case\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"RSS\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.rsslex.com\\\/en\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"The Court of Appeal agrees with \u00c9lisabeth Laroche in a professional responsibility case\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.rsslex.com\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.rsslex.com\\\/\",\"name\":\"RSS - Robinson Sheppard Shapiro\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.rsslex.com\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.rsslex.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0d1c0fa6dcd13392d3db5c5246c97d9d\",\"name\":\"V\u00e9ronique Nollet\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/af968db4245bdb856024dfe4e11f0e5e1840e95112c36381c59713dc230c3a3c?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/af968db4245bdb856024dfe4e11f0e5e1840e95112c36381c59713dc230c3a3c?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/af968db4245bdb856024dfe4e11f0e5e1840e95112c36381c59713dc230c3a3c?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"V\u00e9ronique Nollet\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.rsslex.com\\\/en\\\/author\\\/vnollet\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"The Court of Appeal agrees with \u00c9lisabeth Laroche in a professional responsibility case - RSS - Robinson Sheppard Shapiro","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.rsslex.com\/en\/news\/20181219_the-court-of-appeal-agrees-with-elisabeth-laroche-in-a-professional-responsibility-case\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"The Court of Appeal agrees with \u00c9lisabeth Laroche in a professional responsibility case - RSS - Robinson Sheppard Shapiro","og_description":"In Cansica Holding Inc. c. Boidman, 2018 QCCA 2130, a decision rendered on December 14, the Court of Appeal endorsed \u00c9lisabeth Laroche\u2019s reasoning in defending a lawyer against a claim for professional responsibility. The lawyer had omitted to file a suit to recover amounts owing to his clients, thus precluding them to claim their debt [&hellip;]","og_url":"https:\/\/www.rsslex.com\/en\/news\/20181219_the-court-of-appeal-agrees-with-elisabeth-laroche-in-a-professional-responsibility-case\/","og_site_name":"RSS - Robinson Sheppard Shapiro","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/rsslex\/","article_published_time":"2018-12-19T17:07:46+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-03-04T15:32:38+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1000,"height":500,"url":"https:\/\/www.rsslex.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/Placeholder-News.png","type":"image\/png"}],"author":"V\u00e9ronique Nollet","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"V\u00e9ronique Nollet","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.rsslex.com\/en\/news\/20181219_the-court-of-appeal-agrees-with-elisabeth-laroche-in-a-professional-responsibility-case\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.rsslex.com\/en\/news\/20181219_the-court-of-appeal-agrees-with-elisabeth-laroche-in-a-professional-responsibility-case\/"},"author":{"name":"V\u00e9ronique Nollet","@id":"https:\/\/www.rsslex.com\/#\/schema\/person\/0d1c0fa6dcd13392d3db5c5246c97d9d"},"headline":"The Court of Appeal agrees with \u00c9lisabeth Laroche in a professional responsibility case","datePublished":"2018-12-19T17:07:46+00:00","dateModified":"2025-03-04T15:32:38+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.rsslex.com\/en\/news\/20181219_the-court-of-appeal-agrees-with-elisabeth-laroche-in-a-professional-responsibility-case\/"},"wordCount":230,"articleSection":["Announcements","Civil and Commercial Litigation","Insurance Law"],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.rsslex.com\/en\/news\/20181219_the-court-of-appeal-agrees-with-elisabeth-laroche-in-a-professional-responsibility-case\/","url":"https:\/\/www.rsslex.com\/en\/news\/20181219_the-court-of-appeal-agrees-with-elisabeth-laroche-in-a-professional-responsibility-case\/","name":"The Court of Appeal agrees with \u00c9lisabeth Laroche in a professional responsibility case - RSS - Robinson Sheppard Shapiro","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.rsslex.com\/#website"},"datePublished":"2018-12-19T17:07:46+00:00","dateModified":"2025-03-04T15:32:38+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.rsslex.com\/#\/schema\/person\/0d1c0fa6dcd13392d3db5c5246c97d9d"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.rsslex.com\/en\/news\/20181219_the-court-of-appeal-agrees-with-elisabeth-laroche-in-a-professional-responsibility-case\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.rsslex.com\/en\/news\/20181219_the-court-of-appeal-agrees-with-elisabeth-laroche-in-a-professional-responsibility-case\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.rsslex.com\/en\/news\/20181219_the-court-of-appeal-agrees-with-elisabeth-laroche-in-a-professional-responsibility-case\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"RSS","item":"https:\/\/www.rsslex.com\/en\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"The Court of Appeal agrees with \u00c9lisabeth Laroche in a professional responsibility case"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.rsslex.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.rsslex.com\/","name":"RSS - Robinson Sheppard Shapiro","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.rsslex.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.rsslex.com\/#\/schema\/person\/0d1c0fa6dcd13392d3db5c5246c97d9d","name":"V\u00e9ronique Nollet","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/af968db4245bdb856024dfe4e11f0e5e1840e95112c36381c59713dc230c3a3c?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/af968db4245bdb856024dfe4e11f0e5e1840e95112c36381c59713dc230c3a3c?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/af968db4245bdb856024dfe4e11f0e5e1840e95112c36381c59713dc230c3a3c?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"V\u00e9ronique Nollet"},"url":"https:\/\/www.rsslex.com\/en\/author\/vnollet\/"}]}},"views":266,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rsslex.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16903","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rsslex.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rsslex.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rsslex.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/18"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rsslex.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=16903"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.rsslex.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16903\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":30213,"href":"https:\/\/www.rsslex.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16903\/revisions\/30213"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rsslex.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=16903"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rsslex.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=16903"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rsslex.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=16903"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}