<?xml version="1.0"?>
<oembed><version>1.0</version><provider_name>RSS - Robinson Sheppard Shapiro</provider_name><provider_url>https://www.rsslex.com/en/</provider_url><author_name>V&#xE9;ronique Nollet</author_name><author_url>https://www.rsslex.com/en/author/vnollet/</author_url><title>Defence Costs Battle Between Multiple Insurers : the Insured is No Pawn - RSS - Robinson Sheppard Shapiro</title><type>rich</type><width>600</width><height>338</height><html>&lt;blockquote class="wp-embedded-content" data-secret="8mijrpyCwY"&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.rsslex.com/en/bulletins-en/29127/"&gt;Defence Costs Battle Between Multiple Insurers : the Insured is No Pawn&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;iframe sandbox="allow-scripts" security="restricted" src="https://www.rsslex.com/en/bulletins-en/29127/embed/#?secret=8mijrpyCwY" width="600" height="338" title="&#x201C;Defence Costs Battle Between Multiple Insurers : the Insured is No Pawn&#x201D; &#x2014; RSS - Robinson Sheppard Shapiro" data-secret="8mijrpyCwY" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no" class="wp-embedded-content"&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;&lt;script type="text/javascript"&gt;
/* &lt;![CDATA[ */
/*! This file is auto-generated */
!function(d,l){"use strict";l.querySelector&amp;&amp;d.addEventListener&amp;&amp;"undefined"!=typeof URL&amp;&amp;(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&amp;&amp;!/[^a-zA-Z0-9]/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),c=new RegExp("^https?:$","i"),i=0;i&lt;o.length;i++)o[i].style.display="none";for(i=0;i&lt;a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&amp;&amp;(s.removeAttribute("style"),"height"===t.message?(1e3&lt;(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r&lt;200&amp;&amp;(r=200),s.height=r):"link"===t.message&amp;&amp;(r=new URL(s.getAttribute("src")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&amp;&amp;n.host===r.host&amp;&amp;l.activeElement===s&amp;&amp;(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener("message",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll("iframe.wp-embedded-content"),r=0;r&lt;s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute("data-secret"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+="#?secret="+t,e.setAttribute("data-secret",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:"ready",secret:t},"*")},!1)))}(window,document);
//# sourceURL=https://www.rsslex.com/wp-includes/js/wp-embed.min.js
/* ]]&gt; */
&lt;/script&gt;
</html><description>In Intact Compagnie d&#x2019;assurance v. Lavoie,&#xA0;the Court of Appeal of Quebec ruled that an insured who was already being completely defended by several of its liability insurers lacked the legal interest to compel another of its insurers to contribute to defence costs. The decision stands for the proposition that an insurer cannot use the insured [&hellip;]</description><thumbnail_url>https://www.rsslex.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/Placeholder-News.png</thumbnail_url><thumbnail_width>1000</thumbnail_width><thumbnail_height>500</thumbnail_height></oembed>
